Abstract
ABSTRACTData plots are widely used in science, journalism and politics, since they efficiently allow to depict a large amount of information. Graphicacy, the ability to understand graphs, thus became a fundamental cultural skill. Here, we introduce a new measure of graphicacy that assesses the ability to detect a trend in noisy scatterplots (“does this graph go up or down?”). In 3943 educated participants, responses vary as a sigmoid function of thet-value that a statistician would compute to detect a significant trend. We find a minimum level of core graphicacy even in unschooled participants living in remote Namibian villages (N=87) and 6-year-old 1st-graders who never read a graph (N=27). However, the sigmoid slope (the “graphicacy index”) varies across participants, increases with education, and tightly correlates with statistical knowledge, showing that experience contributes to refining graphical intuitions. Our tool is publicly available online and allows to quickly evaluate intuitive graphics skills.STATEMENT OF RELEVANCEThe rising cost of gas, the number of Covid deaths, the evolution of temperatures during the summer months: we often face graphs depicting these phenomena. The scientific literature has shown that human adults can intuit, within milliseconds, the statistical trend of these graphs. However, we do not know if these intuitions generalized to unschooled people and, most importantly, how to measure their variations in the population. In this study we show that intuitive graphics skills are present even in 6-year-old children who never saw a graph and in the Himba of Namibia, an indigenous people with no access to formal schooling. Furthermore, we developed a quantitative assessment of such intuitive graphics skills (which we called the “graphicacy index”), that everyone can easily obtain for free, through a short (10 minutes) online test:https://neurospin-data.cea.fr/exp/lorenzo-ciccione/graphicacy-index/. In summary, our study provides the first attempt to formally quantify human intuitions of statistical graphs.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference43 articles.
1. Folk biology and the anthropology of science: Cognitive universals and cultural particulars
2. Are intuitive physics and intuitive psychology independent? A test with children with Asperger Syndrome;Journal of Developmental and Learning Disorders,2001
3. Bjorklund, D. F. (2014). Children, childhood, and development in evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 40.
4. Ciccione, L. , Dehaene, G. , & Dehaene, S. (2022). Outlier detection and rejection in scatterplots: Do outliers influence intuitive statistical judgments? PsyArxiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fjk7w
5. Grouping Mechanisms in Numerosity Perception;Open Mind,2020
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献