Enhancing pain care with the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire for use in the Emergency Department (APS-POQ-RED): validating a patient-reported outcome measure

Author:

Hughes James AORCID,Hazelwood SarahORCID,Lyrstedt Anna-Lisa,Jones LeeORCID,Brown Nathan JORCID,Jarugula RajeevORCID,Douglas ClintORCID,Chu KevinORCID

Abstract

AbstractPain is the most common symptom experienced when presenting to the emergency department (ED). Estimates indicate over half of all patients will present in pain. EDs typically focus on care process measures, such as time to first analgesic medication. Process-based metrics remove the patient from their own experience. Unfortunately, when patient-reported measures of pain care are used in the ED for quality improvement or research, they vary widely and often lack validation. Previous work has demonstrated that a modified version of the American Pain Society – Patient Outcome Questionnaire – Revised Edition (APS-POQ-R) may provide an ideal patient-reported outcome measure for the adult ED population. However, previous work has left validation incomplete. In this multi-site, multistage research, we demonstrate the construct, convergent and divergent validity and the internal consistency of a modified version of the APS-POQ-R in adult patients presenting to two large, inner-city EDs with moderate to severe acute pain. After three stages of psychometric testing in 646 patients, we present a nine-question, three construct patient-reported outcome measure for moderate to severe pain in the adult emergency department, now known as the American Pain Society – Patient Outcome Questionnaire – Revised for the ED (APS-POQ-RED).PerspectiveThis article presents the psychometric properties of a revised version of the APS-POQ-R for use in the adult ED. This shortened, ED-specific patient-reported outcome measure (APS-POQ-RED) seeks to provide a standardised, validated measure of patient-reported outcomes of acute pain care in the ED for quality and research purposes.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3