Screening of normal endoscopic large bowel biopsies with artificial intelligence: a retrospective study

Author:

Graham SimonORCID,Minhas FayyazORCID,Bilal MohsinORCID,Ali Mahmoud,Tsang Yee Wah,Eastwood Mark,Wahab Noorul,Jahanifar MostafaORCID,Hero Emily,Dodd Katherine,Sahota Harvir,Wu Shaobin,Lu WenqiORCID,Azam Ayesha,Benes Ksenija,Nimir Mohammed,Hewitt Katherine,Bhalerao Abhir,Robinson Andrew,Eldaly Hesham,E Ahmed Raza ShanORCID,Gopalakrishnan KishoreORCID,Snead DavidORCID,Rajpoot Nasir M.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesDevelop an interpretable AI algorithm to rule out normal large bowel endoscopic biopsies saving pathologist resources.DesignRetrospective study.SettingOne UK NHS site was used for model training and internal validation. External validation conducted on data from two other NHS sites and one site in Portugal.Participants6,591 whole-slides images of endoscopic large bowel biopsies from 3,291 patients (54% Female, 46% Male).Main outcome measuresArea under the receiver operating characteristic and precision recall curves (AUC-ROC and AUC-PR), measuring agreement between consensus pathologist diagnosis and AI generated classification of normal versus abnormal biopsies.ResultsA graph neural network was developed incorporating pathologist domain knowledge to classify the biopsies as normal or abnormal using clinically driven interpretable features. Model training and internal validation were performed on 5,054 whole slide images of 2,080 patients from a single NHS site resulting in an AUC-ROC of 0.98 (SD=0.004) and AUC-PR of 0.98 (SD=0.003). The predictive performance of the model was consistent in testing over 1,537 whole slide images of 1,211 patients from three independent external datasets with mean AUC-ROC = 0.97 (SD=0.007) and AUC-PR = 0.97 (SD=0.005). Our analysis shows that at a high sensitivity threshold of 99%, the proposed model can, on average, reduce the number of normal slides to be reviewed by a pathologist by 55%. A key advantage of IGUANA is its ability to provide an explainable output highlighting potential abnormalities in a whole slide image as a heatmap overlay in addition to numerical values associating model prediction with various histological features. Example results with can be viewed online athttps://iguana.dcs.warwick.ac.uk/.ConclusionsAn interpretable AI model was developed to screen abnormal cases for review by pathologists. The model achieved consistently high predictive accuracy on independent cohorts showing its potential in optimising increasingly scarce pathologist resources and for achieving faster time to diagnosis. Explainable predictions of IGUANA can guide pathologists in their diagnostic decision making and help boost their confidence in the algorithm, paving the way for future clinical adoption.What is already known on this topicIncreasing screening rates for early detection of colon cancer are placing significant pressure on already understaffed and overloaded histopathology resources worldwide and especially in the United Kingdom1.Approximately a third of endoscopic colon biopsies are reported as normal and therefore require minimal intervention, yet the biopsy results can take up to 2-3 weeks2.AI models hold great promise for reducing the burden of diagnostics for cancer screening but require incorporation of pathologist domain knowledge and explainability.What this study addsThis study presents the first AI algorithm for rule out of normal from abnormal large bowel endoscopic biopsies with high accuracy across different patient populations.For colon biopsies predicted as abnormal, the model can highlight diagnostically important biopsy regions and provide a list of clinically meaningful features of those regions such as glandular architecture, inflammatory cell density and spatial relationships between inflammatory cells, glandular structures and the epithelium.The proposed tool can both screen out normal biopsies and act as a decision support tool for abnormal biopsies, therefore offering a significant reduction in the pathologist workload and faster turnaround times.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference77 articles.

1. Written Evidence Submitted by the Royal College of Pathologist’s Digital Pathology Committee (CRV0004). https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/11168/pdf/ (2020).

2. Colonoscopy results. NHS. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/colonoscopy/results/ (2019).

3. Testing Times to Come? An Evaluation of Pathology Capacity Across the UK. Cancer Research UK. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/sites/default/files/testing_times_to_come_nov_16_cruk.pdf (2016).

4. Meeting Pathology Demand. Histopathology Workforce Census. The Royal College of Pathologists. https://www.rcpath.org/uploads/assets/952a934d-2ec3-48c9-a8e6e00fcdca700f/Meeting-Pathology-Demand-Histopathology-Workforce-Census-2018.pdf (2018).

5. Hanna TP , King WD , Thibodeau S , et al. Mortality due to cancer treatment delay: systematic review and meta-analysis. bmj 2020;371.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3