Investigating the Triple Code Model in Numerical Cognition Using Stereotactic Electroencephalography

Author:

Tan Hao,Rockhill Alexander P.,Lopez Ramos Christian G.,Nerison Caleb,Shafie Beck,Shahin Maryam N.,Fecker Adeline,Ismail Mostafa,Cleary Daniel R.,Collins Kelly L.,Raslan Ahmed M.

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe ability to conceptualize numerical quantities is an essential human trait. According to the “Triple Code Model” (TCM) in numerical cognition, distinct neural substrates encode the processing of visual, auditory, and nonsymbolic numerical representations. While our contemporary understanding of human number cognition has benefited greatly from advances in clinical imaging, limited studies have investigated the intracranial electrophysiological correlates of number processing. In this study, 13 subjects undergoing stereotactic electroencephalography for epilepsy participated in a number recognition task. Drawing upon postulates of the TCM, we presented subjects with numerical stimuli varying in representation type (symbolic vs. non-symbolic) and mode of stimuli delivery (visual vs. auditory). Time-frequency spectrograms were dimensionally reduced with principal component analysis and passed into a linear support vector machine classification algorithm to identify regions associated with number perception compared to inter-trial periods. Across representation formats, the highest classification accuracy was observed in the bilateral parietal lobes. Auditory (spoken and beeps) and visual (Arabic) number formats preferentially engaged the superior temporal cortices and the frontoparietal regions, respectively. The left parietal cortex was found to have the highest classification for number dots. Notably, the putamen exhibited robust classification accuracies in response to numerical stimuli. Analyses of spectral feature maps revealed that non-gamma frequency below 30 Hz held greater than chance classification value and could be potentially used to characterize format specific number representations. Taken together, our findings obtained from intracranial recordings provide further support and expand on the TCM model for numerical cognition.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference34 articles.

1. Neural correlates of symbolic number processing in children and adults

2. Is 2+2=4? Meta-analyses of brain areas needed for numbers and calculations

3. Brannon, E. M. , Jordan, K. E. , & Jones, S. M. (2010). Behavioral signatures of numerical cognition. Primate neuroethology, 144–159.

4. API design for machine learning software: experiences from the scikit-learn project;arXiv preprint,2013

5. Bynner, J. , & Parsons, S. (1997). Does Numeracy Matter? Evidence from the National Child Development Study on the Impact of Poor Numeracy on Adult Life. ERIC.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3