Abstract
AbstractIntroductionLabour costs are a key driver of healthcare costs and a key component of economic evaluations in healthcare. We undertook the current study to collect information about workforce costs related to clinical genomic testing in Australia, identifying key components of pay scales and contracts, and incorporating these into a matrix to enable modelling of disaggregated costs.MethodsWe undertook a microcosting study of health workforce labour costs in Australia, from a health services perspective. We mapped the genomic testing processes, identifying the relevant workforce. Data was collected on the identified workforce from publicly available pay scales. Estimates were used to model the total cost from a public health services employer perspective, undertaking deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.ResultsWe identified significant variability in the way in which pay scales and related conditions are both structured and the levels between jurisdictions. The total costs (2023-24 AUD $) ranged from 160,794 (113,848 - 233,350) for administrative staff to 703,206 (548,011 - 923,661) for pathology staff (full-time equivalent). Deterministic sensitivity analysis identified that the base salary accounts for the greatest source of uncertainty, from 24.8% (20.0% - 32.9%) for laboratory technicians to 53.6% (52.8% - 54.4%) for medical scientists.ConclusionVariations in remuneration levels and conditions between Australian jurisdictions account for considerable variation in the estimated cost of labour and may contribute significantly to the uncertainty of economic assessments of genomic testing and other labour-intensive health technologies. We outline an approach to standardise the collection and estimation of uncertainty for Australian health workforce costs and provide current estimates for labour costs.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference20 articles.
1. National Health Care Spending In 2018: Growth Driven By Accelerations In Medicare And Private Insurance Spending;National Health Expenditure Accounts T;Health Aff (Millwood),2020
2. Workforce Health--The Transition From Cost to Outcomes to Business Performance;Benefits Q,2015
3. Health AIo, Welfare. Health expenditure Australia 2021-22. Canberra: AIHW; 2023.
4. Thomas R , Chalkidou K. Cost–effectiveness analysis. In: Cylus J , Papanicolas I , Smith PC , Organization. WH , editors. Health system efficiency: how to make measurement matter for policy and management: World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe; 2016.
5. Economic evaluations of differentiated service delivery should include savings and ancillary benefits, not only health system costs;Aids,2021