Trust and transfer during the covid-19 pandemic: did digital cash transfer save lives?

Author:

Tampubolon GindoORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTBACKGROUNDIn the first semester of 2020 one in six people in the world (1.36 billion) received cash transfers to tide them over the spreading pandemic that originated in Wuhan. By December 2021 it had claimed up to 18.2 million excess deaths. Compared to no (digital) transfer, did digital cash transfer reduce excess deaths? Serendipitously, two years earlier the world reported levels of trust in science. Did such trust inoculate societies from the pandemic?MATERIALS & METHODSThe growing excess deaths literature distinguishes causal factors (e.g. digital transfer) from risk factors (e.g. trust). During the pandemic period, no randomised trials of digital transfer with excess deaths as primary outcome were registered. This study used reports from 170 countries and applied endogenous treatment models to overcome the endogeneity of digital transfer.RESULTS & DISCUSSIONI found that serendipity matters: countries with high trust in science suffered fewer excess deaths. But creativity matters more. Digital transfers –some creatively scrambled from scratch– reduced excess deaths by many more. Equally marked, North-South inequity in excess deaths persists, consistent with the concentration of vaccine distributions in the North early on. All three are statistically significant.A series of robustness analyses points to the results being reliable to change in outcome estimates, change in trust sources, and change in treatment of omitted countries. Mechanistic analyses show evidence that digital transfer created leg room for governments to expand stringent restrictions to control the spread of SARS-CoV-2, while in the South it weakened the correlation between informal economy and excess deaths. This study of the causal effect of digital cash transfer on a hard outcome (excess deaths) revealed ample global digital dividends across the largest number of countries. This new evidence also suggests that improving and monitoring trust in science can offer considerable benefits for humanity.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference39 articles.

1. WHO. Statement on the fifteenth meeting of the IHR Emergency Committee on the Covid-19 pandemic. Accessed 23 May 2023 https://www.who.int/news/item/05-05-2023-statement-on-the-fifteenth-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-pandemic (2023).

2. WHO. 14.9 million excess deaths associated with the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021. Accessed 23 August 2023 https://www.who.int/news/item/05-05-2022-14.9-million-excess-deaths-were-associated-with-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-2020-and-2021 (2023).

3. CSSEGISandData. Covid-19 Data Repository by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University. (2023).

4. Oxford University. Covid-19 Government Response Tracker. Accessed 23 January 2023 https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/research/covid-19-government-response-tracker (2023).

5. Marin, G. & Palacios, R . The Role of Digital in the COVID-19 Social Assistance Response. Accessed 1 January 2023 (2022).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3