Coupling of cell growth modulation to asymmetric division and cell cycle regulation inCaulobacter crescentus

Abstract

AbstractIn proliferating bacteria, growth rate is often assumed to be similar between daughter cells. However, most of our knowledge of cell growth derives from studies on symmetrically dividing bacteria. In many α-proteobacteria, asymmetric division is a normal part of the life cycle, with each division producing daughter cells with different sizes and fates. Here, we demonstrate that the functionally distinct swarmer and stalked daughter cells produced by the model α-proteobacteriumCaulobacter crescentushave different average growth rates despite sharing an identical genome and environment. The discrepancy in growth rate is due to a growth slowdown during the cell cycle stage preceding DNA replication (the G1 phase), which is predominantly associated with swarmer cell functionality. We also provide evidence that the second messenger (p)ppGpp extends the timing of the G1/swarmer cell stage by slowing growth specifically during the beginning of the cell cycle. Our data further show that cells factor the amount and rate of their growth to control the G1/S transition, allowing them to adjust the time they spend with ecologically important G1-specific traits.Significance statementBacterial growth rate modulation is generally associated with changes in genetic make-up or environmental condition. This study demonstrates that the rate of cell growth can also vary between daughter cells and across cell cycle stages under invariant and unstressed environmental conditions. This is illustrated by the asymmetrically dividing α-proteobacteriumCaulobacter crescentus, which, at each division, produces two functionally distinct daughter cells that differ in average growth rate. This growth rate difference arises from a G1 phase-specific growth slowdown mediated, in part, by the (p)ppGpp alarmone. Altogether, this study showcases the coupling of cell growth modulation to asymmetric division and cell cycle regulation, which may have implications for other α-proteobacteria given their cell cycle similarities withC. crescentus.