An Evidenced-Based Prior for Estimating the Treatment Effect of Phase III Randomized Trials in Oncology

Author:

Sherry Alexander D.ORCID,Msaouel Pavlos,Kupferman Gabrielle S.,Lin Timothy A.,Abi Jaoude Joseph,Kouzy Ramez,McCaw Zachary R.ORCID,Ludmir Ethan B.,van Zwet Erik

Abstract

ABSTRACTPurposeThe primary results of phase III oncology trials may be challenging to interpret, given that such results are generally based on meetingP-value thresholds. The probability of whether a treatment is beneficial, although a more intuitive summary of the results, is not provided by most trials. In this study, we developed and released a user-friendly tool that calculates the probability that a treatment studied in a phase III oncology trial is beneficial using published summary statistics.MethodsWe curated the primary time-to-event outcomes of 415 phase III, superiority design, therapeutic randomized controlled trials of oncologic treatments enrolling 338,600 patients and published between 2004 and 2020. A phase III oncology-specific prior probability distribution for the treatment effect was developed based on an estimated three-component zero-mean mixture distribution of the observed z-scores. Using this prior, we computed the probability of any benefit (hazard ratio < 1) and the probability of clinically meaningful benefit (hazard ratio < 0.8) for each trial. The distribution of signal-to-noise ratios of phase III oncology trials was compared with that of 23,551 randomized trials from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.ResultsThe signal-to-noise ratios of phase III oncology trials tended to be much larger than randomized trials from the Cochrane database. Still, the median power of phase III oncology trials was only 49% (IQR, 14% to 95%), and the power was less than 80% in 65% of trials. Using the developed phase III, oncology-specific prior, only 53% of trials claiming superiority (114 of 216) had a ≥ 90% probability of providing clinically meaningful benefits. Conversely, the probability that the experimental arm was superior to the control arm (HR < 1) exceeded 90% in 17% of trials interpreted as having no benefit (34 of 199).ConclusionBy enabling computation of contextual probabilities for the treatment effect from summary statistics, our robust, highly practical tool, now posted on a user-friendly webpage, can aid the wider oncology community in the interpretation of phase III trials.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3