Evidence of Gender Disparities in Citations and Altmetric Attention Score in Oncology

Author:

Campbell Rebecca A.,Helstrom Emma,Chew Lauren,Eapen Renu,Plimack Elizabeth,Correa Andres,Albersen Maarten,Kutikov Alexander,Abbosh Philip,Calaway Adam,Nizam Amanda,Gupta Shilpa,Psutka Sarah,Barata Pedro,Dizman Nazli,Sindhani Mohit,Weight Christopher,Haber Georges,Bukavina Laura

Abstract

AbstractIn this study, we assess gender disparities in both citation rates and Altmetric Attention Scores (AAS) within oncology, utilizing a dataset comprising over 600,000 articles from the past 15 years. The analysis focuses on the differential impact of gender on citation metrics and AAS, the latter of which expands the evaluation of research impact beyond traditional citation analysis to include digital engagement metrics such as social media mentions, news coverage, and policy discussions.Methodologically, the study taps into the Altmetric database, using gender identification tools like the Gender Guesser API to classify articles by the gender composition of their first and last authors. Findings reveal a systemic over-citation of male-first and male-last author pairs (MM), with a mean citation difference (MCD) of +4.7. In stark contrast, female-first and female-last author pairs (WW) experience under-citation, with an MCD of -3.5.A detailed examination of the Altmetric Attention Score shows that female-first authors receive a 7.19% lower AAS compared to male-first authors, indicating significant gender biases in the broader academic and public engagement. Delving deeper into the components of AAS, specifically news media coverage, reveals that female-first authors are covered 10.9% less in news media, 20.4% less patent references and 33.4% in Weibo mentions than their male counterparts. This disparity is significant and suggests a broader trend of underrepresentation and undervaluation of female-led research in more public-facing and influential media outlets.These results underscore the persistent influence of gender on the recognition and valuation of scientific contributions within the field of oncology. They highlight the need for academia and publishing entities to implement more equitable practices to mitigate these disparities and ensure a balanced representation and recognition of scholarly work across genders.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3