Global review of meta-analyses reveals key data gaps in agricultural impact studies on biodiversity in croplands

Author:

Bonfanti JonathanORCID,Langridge JosephORCID,Avadí A.ORCID,Casajus N.ORCID,Chaudhary A.ORCID,Damour G.ORCID,Estrada-Carmona N.ORCID,Jones S. K.ORCID,Makowski D.ORCID,Mitchell M.ORCID,Seppelt R.ORCID,Beillouin DamienORCID

Abstract

AbstractAimAgriculture depends heavily on biodiversity, yet unsustainable management practices continue to affect a wide range of organisms and ecosystems at unprecedented levels worldwide. Addressing the global challenge of biodiversity loss requires access to consolidated knowledge across management practices, spatial levels, and taxonomic groups.LocationGlobalTime period1994 to 2022Major taxa studiedAnimals, microorganisms, plants.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive literature review synthesising data from all meta-analyses about the impacts of agricultural management practices on biodiversity in croplands, covering field, farm, and landscape levels. From 200 retained meta-analyses, we extracted 1,885 mean effect sizes (from 69,850 comparisons between a control and treatment) assessing the impact of management practices on biodiversity, alongside characterising over 9,000 primary papers.ResultsSeven high-income countries, notably the USA, China, and Brazil dominate agricultural impact studies with fertiliser use, phytosanitary interventions and crop diversification receiving widespread attention. The focus on individual practices overshadows research at the farm and landscape level. Taxonomically, Animalia, especially arthropods, are heavily studied while taxa such as annelids and plants receive comparatively less attention. Effect sizes are predominantly calculated from averaged abundance data. Significant gaps persist in terms of studies on the effects of agricultural interventions on specific taxonomic groups (e.g. annelids, mammals) and studies analysing functional traits.Main conclusionsOur study highlights the importance of analysing the effects of combined practices to accurately reflect real-world farming contexts. While abundance metrics are common, reflecting several biodiversity facets and adopting a more balanced research approach across taxa are crucial for understanding biodiversity responses to agricultural changes and informing conservation strategies. Given the unbalanced evidence on impacts of agricultural practices on biodiversity, caution is required when utilising meta-analytical findings for informing public policies or integrating them into global assessment models like life-cycle assessments or global flux models.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference66 articles.

1. Enumerating soil biodiversity

2. Babin, C. , Espagnol, S. & Aubin, J. (2023). Effects of agricultural practices on biodiversity. A review.

3. Bánki, O. , Roskov, Y. , Döring, M. , Ower, G. , Vandepitte, L. , Hobern, D. , et al. (2024). Catalogue of life checklist. Version 2024-10-18.

4. Conventional land-use intensification reduces species richness and increases production: A global meta-analysis;Glob. Change Biol,2019

5. Evidence map of crop diversification strategies at the global scale;Environ. Res. Lett,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3