Abstract
AbstractError awareness is a fundamental mechanism in humans. Through traditional psychological tasks, certain neural activities that represent errors in objective manners have been identified. However, there is limited knowledge on how humans subjectively determine right from wrong in moral contexts. In this study, participants (N=39) mentally simulated themselves as the agents of moral and immoral behaviors, while viewing a series of actions with EEG recording and MRI scanning, respectively. A significant difference in error-related negativity (ERN) was observed among morally wrong scenarios, accompanied by higher wrongfulness ratings. Additionally, individual differences in guilt-proneness could predict the subjects’ ERN amplitude. The ERN amplitude was correlated with the BOLD activity in the anterior mid-cingulate cortex and anterior insula to immoral scenarios, reflecting error awareness toward moral wrongfulness. The late potential component displayed greater negativity to immoral scenarios and was correlated with BOLD activities in the amygdala, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and temporoparietal junction, indicating cognitive and affective evaluation in moral judgment. In line with the moral dynamic framework, our results demonstrated individual variability in moral judgments, as indicated by dispersed and overlapping cognitive neural networks. This suggests that subjective evaluations of wrongfulness are underpinned by neural mechanisms, associated with those involved in objective error awareness.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory