Abstract
AbstractIn this study we propose a novel agent-based model to reproduce and propose new hypotheses on the biological mechanisms of cell-cell interactions and cell migration from data obtained during scratch assay with healthy and keloid fibroblasts. The advantage of the agent-based model we propose in this paper lies in its simplicity: only three governing parameters. We conducted a parametric sensitivity analysis and we incorporated the evaluation of contact inhibition of locomotion, aligning with the observed loss during malignant invasion. To study invasion modalities, we conductedin vitrowound healing assays using healthy and pseudo-tumoral (keloid) fibroblasts under diverse conditions: control, macrophage type 1 secretome, and macrophage type 2 secretome. Mitomycin inhibition of proliferation isolated the contribution of migration to wound filling. Our agent-based mathematical model describes configurations based on our microscopy imaging and statistical data, which enables quantitative comparisons between our experimental and numerical results. Calibration and evaluation were performed on the same experiments, enriched by external datasets. With only three governing parameters, our model not only demonstrated good agreement (8.78% to 18.75% error) with external evaluation datasets for all experimental configurations but also provided us with a nuanced understanding of keloid fibroblast behavior during wound healing, especially regarding contact inhibition dynamics.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference35 articles.
1. Keloid and hypertrophic scars are the result of chronic inflammation in the reticular dermis;International journal of molecular sciences,2017
2. Myofibroblast phenotype and apoptosis in keloid and palmar fibroblasts in vitro
3. Differential Expression of Transforming Growth Factor-β Receptors I and II and Activation of Smad 3 in Keloid Fibroblasts
4. A comparison of apoptosis levels in keloid tissue, physiological scars and normal skin;American journal of translational research,2017
5. Phenotypic differences between dermal fibroblasts from different body sites determine their responses to tension and TGFβ1;BMC dermatology,2002