Initial treatment choices for long term remission of insomnia disorder in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Author:

Furukawa Yuki,Sakata Masatsugu,Furukawa Toshi A.ORCID,Efthimiou Orestis,Perlis Michael

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundCognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), pharmacotherapy and their combination are effective for insomnia. However, it remains unclear which treatment is more likely to lead to favorable long-term outcomes when used as the initial treatment. We aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy and acceptability of CBT-I, pharmacotherapy, and their combination in the long- and short-terms among adults with insomnia disorder.MethodsWe searched PubMed, CENTRAL, PsycINFO and WHO ICTRP from database inception to Dec 27, 2023, to identify published and unpublished randomized controlled trials. We included trials in hypnotic-free adults with insomnia disorder comparing at least two of the following: CBT-I with at least one effective component (sleep restriction, stimulus control, cognitive restructuring, and third wave components), pharmacotherapy, or their combination. We assessed the confidence in evidence using CINeMA. The primary outcome was long-term remission (longest follow-up between 3 to 12 months). Secondary outcomes included all-cause dropout and self-reported sleep continuity measures at long-term follow-up, and the same outcomes at the end of the acute treatment phase. We performed frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses. We used odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference for continuous outcomes, expressed in minutes and percent. This study is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024505519).FindingsWe identified 13 trials, including 823 randomized participants (mean age, 47.8 years, 60% women). Results suggested that CBT-I was more beneficial than pharmacotherapy in the long-term (remission OR 1.82 [95% Confidence Interval (CI), 1.15 to 2.87; certainty of evidence: high]), while there was weaker evidence of benefit of combination against pharmacotherapy (OR 1.71 [95%CI, 0.88 to 3.30: moderate]) and no clear evidence of difference of CBT-I against combination (OR 1.07 [95%CI, 0.63 to 1.80: moderate]). CBT-I was associated with less dropouts than pharmacotherapy in the long-term. Short-term outcomes also favored CBT-I over pharmacotherapy except total sleep time. Given the average long-term remission rate in the pharmacotherapy-initiating arms of 28%, CBT-I resulted in a long-term remission rate of 41% (95% CI: 31% to 53%) and combination 40% (95% CI: 25% to 56%).InterpretationThis study found that starting with CBT-I for the treatment of adults with chronic insomnia leads to better outcomes than starting with pharmacotherapy. Combination therapy may be better than pharmacotherapy alone, but unlikely to be worth the additional burden over CBT-I alone.FundingNone.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3