Abstract
AbstractObjectivesKaroli Lwanga Hospital and Global Emergency Care, a 501(c)(3) nongovernmental organization, operate an Emergency Department (ED) in Uganda’s rural Rukungiri District. Despite available emergency care (EC), preventable death and disability persist due to delayed patient presentations. Implementation of effective EC requires assessment of socioeconomic, cultural, and structural factors leading to treatment delay.MethodsWe purposefully sampled and interviewed patients and caregivers presenting to the ED more than 12 hours after onset of chief complaint in January-March 2017 to include various ages, genders, and complaints. Semistructured interviews addressing actions taken before seeking EC and delays to presentation once the need for EC was recognized were conducted. Interviews were audio recorded, translated, and transcribed, enabling the interdisciplinary and multicultural research team to conduct thematic analysis utilizing a grounded theory approach.ResultsThe 50 ED patients for whom care was sought (mean age 33) had approximately even distribution of gender, as well as occupation (none, subsistence farmers and small business owner). Interviews were conducted with 37 caregivers and 13 ED patients. The majority of interviewees (mean age 38 years) were women with a primary education. The median duration of patients’ chief complaint on ED presentation was 5.5 days. On average, participants identified severe symptoms necessitating EC 1 day before presentation. Four themes of treatment delay before and after severity were recognized were identified: 1) Cultural factors and limited knowledge of emergency signs and initial actions to take ; 2) Use of local health facilities despite perception of inadequate services; 3) Lack of resources to cover the anticipated cost of obtaining EC; 4) Inadequate transportation options.ConclusionsInterventions are warranted to address each of the four major reasons for treatment delay. The next stage of formative research will generate intervention strategies and assess the opportunities and challenges to implementation with community and health system stakeholders.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference54 articles.
1. Prehospital and Emergency Care: Updates from the Disease Control Priorities, Version 3;World J Surg,2015
2. SIXTIETH WORLD HEALTH ASSEMBLY. WHA60.22: Health systems: emergency-care systems [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2020 Dec 20]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/22596/A60_R22-en.pdfãsequence=1&isAllowed=y
3. WHA72 R. Resolution WHA72.16. Emergency care systems for universal health coverage: ensuring timely care for the acutely ill and injured. Seventysecond World Health Assem Geneva. 2019;28.
4. Harnessing inter-disciplinary collaboration to improve emergency care in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs): results of research prioritisation setting exercise;BMC Emerg Med,2020
5. Global Health and Emergency Care: Defining Clinical Research Priorities;Acad Emerg Med,2017