Actions for fostering cross-disciplinary global health research A qualitative research

Author:

Ding YanORCID,Tomeny EwanORCID,Bates ImeldaORCID,

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionThe ability to conduct cross-disciplinary research in international collaborations is critical for improving global health. Published evidence on actions to foster cross-disciplinary research comes mainly from high-income countries with its applicability to global health unclear. Our study investigated the actions taken to foster cross-disciplinary research across a North-South global health programme to recommend actions to improve the effectiveness of future cross-disciplinary research programmes in global health.MethodsWe used an adapted three-component framework to frame data collection and analyses. Building on a recent literature review, we compared actions used by the programme for planning, implementing and managing cross-disciplinary research to those described in the literature. Data sources included interviews with 31 participants (including researchers, administrators, and collaborators), a review of programme documents, a baseline survey, and observations of interactions at meetings and events. Interview data were coded and analysed using the framework. Narrative summaries were created using thematic synthesis and triangulated by the document review and observations.ResultsFor cross-disciplinary research to be successful in global health, a shared vision with explicit goals is essential. These goals concern knowledge integration supported by regular communication, orientation about involved disciplines, and equitable partnerships across institutions and individuals. Fostering cross-disciplinary global health research needs a significant time investment from researchers, support staff, and programme leaders. Indicators for tracking cross-disciplinary working should be agreed at the outset and monitored throughout.ConclusionCross-disciplinary activities should be managed separately from primary research activities. The three-component framework would be helpful in guiding designing cross-disciplinary programmes.Summary BoxWhat is already known?Global health can be advanced by cross-disciplinary collaboration within and beyond the health sciences.Individual researchers, research team leaders, academic institutions and research funders all have roles in making cross-disciplinary research more effective.Published evidence on actions to foster cross-disciplinary research comes mainly from high-income countries and its applicability to global health is unclear.What are the new findings?The cross-disciplinary aspects of research programmes need to be actively managed.Pre-agreed indicators should be used to plan and track cross-disciplinary research.Fostering cross-disciplinary research and managing tensions takes time and explicit continuous discussions.Our adapted three-component framework (i.e., planning, implementation and management) is useful for collecting and analysing multi-source and multi-perspective data on a cross-disciplinary programme in real-time.What do the new findings imply?Cross-disciplinary activities should be managed and tracked separately from the primary research activities.Progress in research planning, implementation, and management should be reviewed against pre-agreed indicators, with troubleshooting conducted accordingly.Cross-disciplinary research requires the allocation of more time and funds for active management of research planning than would be required for mono-disciplinary projects.The three-component framework would be helpful in guiding the design of cross-disciplinary programmes.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference29 articles.

1. Towards a common definition of global health

2. Stipelman, B.A. , et al., Mapping the Impact of Transdisciplinary Research: A Visual Comparison of Investigator-Initiated and Team-Based Tobacco Use Research Publications. Journal of Translational Medicine & Epidemiology, 2014. 2(2).

3. Practical actions for fostering cross-disciplinary global health research: lessons from a narrative literature review

4. Transdisciplinarity in land use science – A review of concepts, empirical findings and current practices;Futures,2015

5. On the nature of cross-disciplinary integration: A philosophical framework;Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3