Convergent clonal selection of donor- and recipient-derived CMV-specific T cells in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients

Abstract

AbstractCompetition between antigen-specific T cells for peptide:MHC (p:MHC) complexes shapes the ensuing T cell response. Mouse model studies provided compelling evidence that competition is a highly effective mechanism controlling the activation of naïve T cells. However, assessing the effect of T cell competition in the context of a human infection requires defined pathogen kinetics and trackable naïve and memory T cell populations of defined specificity. A unique cohort of non-myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplant (nmHSCT) patients allowed us to assess T cell competition in response to CMV reactivation, which was documented with detailed virology data. In our cohort, HSCT donors and recipients were CMV-seronegative and -positive, respectively, thus providing genetically distinct memory and naïve T cell populations. We used single-cell transcriptomics to track donor versus recipient-derived T cell clones over the course of 90 days. We found that donor-derived T cell clones proliferated and expanded substantially following CMV-reactivation. However, for immunodominant CMV epitopes, recipient-derived memory T cells remained the overall dominant population. This dominance was maintained despite more robust clonal expansion of donor-derived T cells in response to CMV reactivation. Interestingly, the donor-derived T cells that were recruited into these immunodominant memory populations shared strikingly similar TCR properties with the recipient-derived memory T cells. This selective recruitment of identical and nearly identical clones from the naïve into the immunodominant memory T cell pool suggests that competition does not interfere with rejuvenating a memory T cell population, but results in selection of convergent clones to the memory T cell pool.SignificanceAn existing memory T cell population specific for a single epitope is sufficient to effectively curtail responses to any new antigens if the original epitope is present in a vaccination regimen or heterologous infections. We asked if T cell competition precludes recruitment of any new, naïve T cells to an existing memory T cell pool in context of CMV-specific T cell responses in a cohort of transplant patients. Our data indicate that competition does not prevent recruitment of naïve T cells into the memory T cell pool, but selects for T cells with nearly or fully congruent T cell receptor specificities. We discuss the implications of rejuvenating a memory T cell pool while preserving the T cell receptor repertoire.