Retinal oxygen delivery and extraction in ophthalmologically healthy subjects with different blood pressure status

Author:

Pappelis KonstantinosORCID,Jansonius Nomdo M.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo compare retinal oxygen delivery (DO2) and extraction (VO2) in ophthalmologically healthy subjects with different blood pressure (BP) status.MethodsIn this case-control study, we prospectively included 93 eyes of 93 subjects (age 50-65) from a large-scale population-based Dutch cohort (n=167,000) and allocated them to four groups (low BP, normal BP [controls], treated arterial hypertension [AHT], untreated AHT). We estimated vascular calibers from fundus images and fractal dimension (FD) from optical coherence tomography angiography scans. We combined calibers, FD, BP, and intraocular pressure measurements in a proxy of total retinal blood flow (RBF), using a validated Poiseuille-based model. We measured arterial and venous oxygen saturations (SaO2, SvO2) with a two-wavelength scanning laser ophthalmoscope. We calculated DO2 and VO2 from RBF, SaO2, and SvO2. We compared DO2 and VO2 between groups and investigated the DO2-VO2 association.ResultsDO2 and VO2 were different between groups (P=0.009, P=0.036, respectively). In post hoc analysis, the low BP group had lower DO2 than the untreated AHT group (P=4.9·10-4), while both the low BP group and the treated AHT group had lower VO2 than the untreated AHT group (P=0.021, P=0.034, respectively). There was a significant DO2-VO2 correlation (Robs=0.65, bobs=0.51, P=2.4·10-12). After correcting for shared measurement error, the slope was no longer significant (bcor=0.19, P=0.29), while the correlation coefficient could not be calculated.ConclusionsDO2 and VO2 were altered in ophthalmologically healthy subjects with different BP status. Future studies could elucidate whether these changes can explain the increased risk of several ophthalmic pathologies in those subjects.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3