Abstract
AbstractBackgroundClinical practice guidelines (CPGs) aim to standardize clinical care. Increasingly, hospitals rely on locally produced guidelines alongside national guidance. This study examines variation between national and local CPGs, using the example of acute paediatric asthma guidance from the United Kingdom and the Netherlands.MethodsFifteen British and Dutch local CPGs were collected with the matching national guidance for the management of acute asthma in children under 18 years old. The drug sequences, routes and methods of administration recommended for patients with severe asthma and the tone of recommendation across both types of CPGs were schematically represented. Deviations from national guidance were measured. Variation in recommended doses of intravenous salbutamol was examined.ResultsBritish and Dutch national CPGs differed in the recommended drug choices, sequences, routes and methods of administration for severe asthma. Dutch national guidance was more rigidly defined. Local British CPGs diverged from national guidance for 23% of their recommended interventions compared to 8% for Dutch local CPGs. Five British local guidelines and two Dutch local guidelines differed from national guidance for multiple treatment steps. Variation in second-line recommendations was greater than for first-line recommendations across local CPGs from both countries. Recommended starting doses for salbutamol infusions varied by more than tenfold.ConclusionsLocal CPGs for the management of severe acute paediatric asthma featured substantial variation and frequently diverged from national guidance. Although limited to one condition, this study suggests that unmeasured variation across local CPGs may contribute to variation of care more broadly, with possible effects on healthcare quality.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference43 articles.
1. Clinical practice guidelines to inform evidence-based clinical practice
2. Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on;Lancet,2017
3. Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust [Internet]. Washington DC;2011[cited 2020 Jun 23]. 266 p. Report No: 978-0-309-16422-1. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209539/.
4. Transforming clinical practice guidelines and clinical pathways into fast-and-frugal decision trees to improve clinical care strategies;J Eval Clin Pract,2018
5. Clinical guidelines: Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines