Abstract
Pitch perception is at the core of our experience of both speech and music1,2,3. Music theorists4,5, psychologists6,7, and neuroscientists8,9,10have sought to determine the psychological representation of musical pitch for centuries. The pitch helix, which jointly represents logarithmic scaling of the periodicity of a tone and the heightened similarity between tones separated by an octave, has been widely assumed to capture the psychological geometry of pitch6,7,11. However, empirical support for this structure is inconclusive, in part because it relies on studies with small sample sizes6,12,13,14,15. Here we revisit this problem using a series of comprehensive experiments involving musicians and non-musicians performing three established tasks based on similarity judgments and singing16,17,18. We show that a simple helical representation alone cannot explain the data. Rather, our results demonstrate that, depending on the task and musical experience10,19, the geometry of pitch can exhibit linear, degenerate-helical, and double-helical structures, suggesting a new, broader understanding of how we perceive pitch.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference64 articles.
1. Association, A. S. et al. Acoustical terminology SI. 1-1960, American Standards Association (1960).
2. Levitin, D. J. This is your brain on music: The science of a human obsession (Penguin, 2006).
3. Patel, A. D. Music, language, and the brain (Oxford university press, 2010).
4. d’Arezzo, G. Micrologus . ed. Joseph Smits van Waesberghe. Rome: American Institute of Musicology (1955).
5. Octave (i)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献