Quantifying the impact of sample, instrument, and data processing on biological signatures detected with Raman spectroscopy

Author:

Wiemann JasminaORCID,Heck Philipp R.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractRaman spectroscopy is a popular tool for characterizing complex biological materials and their geological remains1-10. Ordination methods, such as Principal Component Analysis (PCA), rely on spectral variance to create a compositional space1, the ChemoSpace, grouping samples based on spectroscopic manifestations that reflect different biological properties or geological processes1-7. PCA allows to reduce the dimensionality of complex spectroscopic data and facilitates the extraction of relevant informative features into data formats suitable for downstream statistical analyses, thus representing an essential first step in the development of diagnostic biosignatures. However, there is presently no systematic survey of the impact of sample, instrument, and spectral processing on the occupation of the ChemoSpace. Here the influence of sample count, signal-to-noise ratios, spectrometer decalibration, baseline subtraction routines, and spectral normalization on ChemoSpace grouping is investigated using synthetic spectra. Increase in sample size improves the dissociation of sample groups in the ChemoSpace, however, a stable pattern in occupation can be achieved with less than 10 samples per group. Systemic noise of different amplitude and frequency, features that can be introduced by instrument or sample11,12, are eliminated by PCA even when spectra of differing signal-to-noise ratios are compared. Routine offsets (± 1 cm−1) in spectrometer calibration contribute to less than 0.1% of the total spectral variance captured in the ChemoSpace, and do not obscure biological information. Standard adaptive baselining, together with normalization, increase spectral comparability and facilitate the extraction of informative features. The ChemoSpace approach to biosignatures represents a powerful tool for exploring, denoising, and integrating molecular biological information from modern and ancient organismal samples.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3