Abstract
AbstractSince industrialization began, atmospheric CO2([CO2]) has increased from 270 to 415 ppm and is projected to reach 800-1000 ppm this century. SomeArabidopsisecotypes delayed flowering in elevated [CO2] relative to current [CO2], while others showed no change or accelerations. To predict genotype-specific flowering behaviors, we must understand the mechanisms driving flowering response to rising [CO2]. [CO2] changes alter photosynthesis and carbohydrates in C3plants. Plants sense carbohydrate levels and exogenous carbohydrate application influences flowering time and flowering transcript levels. We asked how organismal changes in carbohydrates and transcription correlate with changes in flowering time under elevated [CO2]. We used a genotype (SG) ofArabidopsisthat was selected for high fitness at elevated [CO2] (700 ppm). SG delays flowering under elevated [CO2] (700 ppm) relative to current [CO2] (400 ppm). We compared SG to a closely related control genotype (CG) that shows no [CO2]- induced flowering change. We compared metabolomic and transcriptomic profiles in these genotypes at current and elevated [CO2] to assess correlations with flowering in these conditions. While both genotypes altered carbohydrates in response to elevated [CO2], SG had higher levels of sucrose than CG and showed a stronger increase in glucose and fructose in elevated [CO2]. Both genotypes demonstrated transcriptional changes, with CG increasing genes related to fructose 1,6-bisphosphate breakdown, amino acid synthesis, and secondary metabolites; and SG decreasing genes related to starch and sugar metabolism, but increasing genes involved in oligosaccharide production and sugar modifications. Genes associated with flowering regulation within the photoperiod, vernalization, and meristem identity pathways were altered in these genotypes. Elevated [CO2] may act through carbohydrate changes to influence transcription in both genotypes and delayed flowering in SG. Changes in the oligosaccharide pool may contribute to delayed flowering in SG. This work extends the literature exploring genotypic-specific flowering responses to elevated [CO2].
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference133 articles.
1. Masson-Delmotte V , Zhai P , Pirani A , Connors SL , Péan C , Berger S , Caud N , Chen Y , Goldfarb L , Gomis MI , Huang M , Leitzell K , Lonnoy E , Matthews JBR , Maycock TK , Waterfield T , Yelekçi Ö , Yu R , Zhou B , editors. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press; 2021.
2. EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON PHENOLOGY, FROST DAMAGE, AND FLORAL ABUNDANCE OF MONTANE WILDFLOWERS
3. Pollinator effectiveness varies with experimental shifts in flowering time
4. An ecological function in crisis? The temporal overlap between plant flowering and pollinator function shrinks as the Arctic warms;Ecography,2016
5. Plant-pollinator interactions and phenological change: what can we learn about climate impacts from experiments and observations?