Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean from the Patient Perspective: A Prospective Study of the ERAC Questionnaire (ERAC-Q)

Abstract

ABSTRACTOBJECTIVETo evaluate the impact of an Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean (ERAC) protocol on the post-cesarean recovery experience using a validated ten-item questionnaire (ERAC-Q).METHODSThis is a prospective cohort study of patients completing ERAC quality-of-life questionnaires (ERAC-Q) during inpatient recovery after cesarean delivery (CD) between October 2019 and September 2020, before and after the implementation of our ERAC protocol. Patients with non-Pfannenstiel incision, ICU admission, massive transfusion, bowel injury, existing chronic pain disorders, acute postpartum depression, or neonatal demise were excluded. The ERAC-Q was administered on postoperative day one and day of discharge to the pre– and post-ERAC implementation cohorts, rating aspects of their recovery experience on a scale of 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The primary outcome was ERAC-Q scores. Statistical analysis was performed with SAS software.RESULTSThere were 196 and 112 patients in the pre– and post-ERAC cohorts, respectively. The post-ERAC group reported significantly lower total ERAC-Q scores compared to the pre-ERAC group, reflecting fewer adverse symptoms and greater perceived recovery on postoperative day one (1.6 [0.7, 2.8] vs. 2.7 [1.6, 4.3]) and day of discharge (0.8 [0.3, 1.5] vs. 1.4 [0.7, 2.2]) (p<0.001). ERAC-Q responses did not predict the time to achieve objective postoperative milestones. However, worse ERAC-Q pain and total scores were associated with higher inpatient opiate use.CONCLUSIONSERAC implementation positively impacts patient recovery experience. The administration of ERAC-Q can provide real-time feedback on patient-perceived recovery quality and how healthcare protocol changes may impact their experience.