Comparison of Rupture Risk Between Saccular and Fusiform Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using a National Clinical Database in Japan

Author:

Ozawa Hirotsugu,Takahashi Arata,Bessho RyuzoORCID,Hoshina Katsuyuki,Shukuzawa Kota,Ohki Takao

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundSaccular AAAs are thought to pose an elevated risk of rupture, but not much is known about the extent of this risk. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a survey of saccular abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and to compare the risk of rupture between fusiform and saccular AAAs.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study on patients who underwent primary endovascular repair for a degenerative AAA between 2016 and 2019, and who were registered in the National Clinical Database in Japan.ResultsA total of 27,290 patients were included in the study. Of these, 7.8 % (n=2142) had saccular AAAs and the remaining 92.2% (n = 25,148) were fusiform. In addition, 4.3% (n = 92) of saccular AAAs and 5.4% (n = 1351) of fusiform AAAs were ruptured. Saccular AAAs ruptured at smaller dimeters than fusiform AAAs (median, 55.6 mm vs 68.0 mm, p < 0.001), and were operated on at smaller diameters than fusiform AAAs in non-ruptured cases (median, 44.0 mm vs 51.0 mm, p < 0.001). The rupture rate was significantly higher in saccular AAAs than in fusiform AAAs in the 40-54 mm diameter range, in which saccular morphology was found to be an independent risk factor for rupture by adjusting for gender and aneurysm diameter (odds ratio, 2.54, 95% confidence interval, 1.75-3.69). In addition, receiver-operating characteristic analysis revealed that the cut-off diameter to predict rupture was smaller in saccular AAAs than in fusiform AAAs (50.5 mm and 59.5 mm, respectively).ConclusionSaccular AAAs are more prone to rupture than fusiform AAAs in the 40-54 mm diameter range, which supports the idea that saccular AAAs should be treated at smaller diameters. The 9.0 mm difference in the predicted diameters for the rupture between fusiform and saccular AAAs suggests that the threshold diameter for intervention of saccular AAAs can be set approximately 1 cm smaller than that of fusiform AAAs.Clinical PerspectiveWhat Is New?Saccular abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) ruptured at smaller dimeters than fusiform AAAs (median, 55.6 mm vs 68.0 mm, p < 0.001), and receiver-operating characteristic analysis revealed that the cut-off diameter to predict rupture was smaller in saccular AAAs than in fusiform AAAs (50.5 mm and 59.5 mm, respectively).In AAAs with a dimeter of 40-54 mm, saccular morphology turned out to be an independent risk factor for rupture by adjusting for gender and aneurysm diameter (odds ratio, 2.54, 95% confidence interval, 1.75-3.69).What Are the Clinical Implications?Saccular AAAs are more prone to rupture than fusiform AAAs in the 40-54 mm diameter range, which supports the current idea that saccular AAAs should be treated at smaller diameters.The 9.0 mm difference in the predicted diameters for the rupture between fusiform and saccular AAAs suggests that the threshold diameter for intervention of saccular AAAs can be set approximately 1 cm smaller than that of fusiform AAAs.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference27 articles.

1. Atherosclerotic abdominal aorta saccular protrusion;Int Surg,1996

2. Saccular Aortic Aneurysms

3. Morphology of Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Should be Considered before Continued Ultrasound Surveillance;Ann Vasc Surg,2016

4. Contribution of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysmectomy to Prolongation of Life

5. Factors influencing the rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms;Surg Gynecol Obstet,1991

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3