Abstract
AbstractBicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is frequently reported as the most common congenital cardiac condition, with 1-2% prevalence by citing one or two autopsy studies performed up to forty years ago. Since then, echocardiography population screening studies have reported contemporaneous results, with lower prevalence, given the absence of autopsy selection bias. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of autopsy and echocardiography studies to provide a more accurate synthesis of BAV prevalence. Following a systematic literature review, we performed a meta-analysis of prevalence studies using MetaXL Software Version 5.3 by EpiGear, St Lucia, Australia. The results of 45,630 autopsy patients reveal a prevalence of 0.81% (0.5-1.2%, p<0.001, n=444) and 296,245 echocardiography screened population of 0.61% (0.39-0.82% p<0.001, n=1,392) BAV prevalence. The average prevalence of 0.61-0.81% between the two studies still shows this is a common congenital cardiac condition, but shows it is less than frequently reported and thus robustly supports the case of cost effectiveness in screening first degree relatives.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference45 articles.
1. Rare non-synonymous variations in the transcriptional activation domains of GATA5 in bicuspid aortic valve disease;J Mol Cell Cardiol [Internet],2012
2. 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines;Circulation,2022
3. Clinical significance of the bicuspid aortic valve;Heart [Internet],2000
4. The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve;A study of 85 autopsy cases. Am J Cardiol,1970
5. Hiratzka LF , Bakris GL , Beckman JA , Bersin RM , Carr VF , Casey DE , et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Thoracic Aortic Disease [Internet]. Vol. 121, Circulation. 2010. Available from: http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/doi/10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181d4739e