Comparison of CT-Derived Plaque Characteristic Index with CMR Perfusion for Ischemia Diagnosis in Stable CAD

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundCoronary CT angiography (CCTA) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) have been used to diagnose lesion-specific ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of CCTA-derived plaque characteristic index compared with myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) derived from CMR perfusion in the assessment of lesion-specific ischemia.MethodsBetween October 2020 and March 2022, consecutive patients with suspected or known CAD, who were clinically referred for ICA were prospectively enrolled. All participants sequentially underwent CCTA and CMR and invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) within 2 weeks. The diagnostic performance of CCTA-derived plaque characteristics, CMR perfusion-derived stress MBF, and MPR were compared. Lesions with FFR ≤ 0.80 were considered to be hemodynamically significant stenosis.ResultsNighty-two patients with 141 vessels were included in this study. Plaque length, minimum luminal area, plaque area, percent area stenosis, total atheroma volume, vessel volume, lipid rich volume, spotty calcium, napkin-ring signs, stress MBF and MPR in flow-limiting stenosis group were significantly different from non-flow limiting group. The overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of lesion-specific ischemia diagnosis were 61.0%, 55.3%, 63.1%, 35.6%, 79.3% for stress MBF, and 89.4%, 89.5%, 89.3%, 75.6%, 95.8% for MPR, meanwhile 82.3%, 79.0%, 84.5%, 65.2%, 91.6% for CCTA-Derived plaque characteristic index.ConclusionIn our prospective study, CCTA-derived plaque characteristics and MPR derived from CMR performed well in diagnosing lesion-specific myocardial ischemia, and were significantly better than stress MBF in stable coronary artery disease.