Diagnostic test accuracy of artificial intelligence in screening for referable diabetic retinopathy in real-world settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Uy HolijahORCID,Fielding Christopher,Hohlfeld AmeerORCID,Ochodo Eleanor,Opare AbrahamORCID,Mukonda Elton,Minnies Deon,Engel Mark EORCID

Abstract

AbstractStudies on artificial intelligence (AI) in screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) have shown promising results in addressing the mismatch between the capacity to implement DR screening and the increasing DR incidence; however, most of these studies were done retrospectively. This review sought to evaluate the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of AI in screening for referable diabetic retinopathy (RDR) in real-world settings. We searched CENTRAL, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science on 9 February 2023. We included prospective DTA studies assessing AI against trained human graders (HGs) in screening for RDR in patients living with diabetes. synthesis Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality against QUADAS-2 criteria. We used the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) model to pool estimates of sensitivity and specificity and, forest plots and SROC plots to visually examine heterogeneity in accuracy estimates. Finally, we conducted sensitivity analyses to explore the effects of studies deemed to possibly affect the quality of the studies. We included 15 studies (17 datasets: 10 patient-level analysis (N=45,785), and 7 eye-level analysis (N=15,390). Meta-analyses revealed a pooled sensitivity of 95.33%(95% CI: 90.60-100%) and specificity of 92.01%(95% CI: 87.61-96.42%) for patient-level analysis; for the eye-level analysis, pooled sensitivity was 91.24% (95% CI: 79.15-100%) and specificity, 93.90% (95% CI: 90.63-97.16%). Subgroup analyses did not provide variations in the diagnostic accuracy of country classification and DR classification criteria; however, a moderate increase was observed in diagnostic accuracy at the primary-level and, a minimal decrease in the tertiary-level healthcare settings. Sensitivity analyses did not show any variations in studies that included diabetic macular edema in the RDR definition, nor in studies with ≥3 HGs. This review provides evidence, for the first time from prospective studies, for the effectiveness of AI in screening for RDR, in real-world settings.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference38 articles.

1. Teo ZL , Tham Y-C , Yan Yu MC , Chee ML , Rim TH , Cheung N , et al. Global prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and projection of burden through 2045: Systematic review and meta-analysis. American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2021;128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.04.027

2. Diabetic retinopathy preferred practice pattern;American Academy of Ophthalmology,2019

3. The real-world impact of artificial intelligence on diabetic retinopathy screening in primary care;Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology,2021

4. International Council of Ophthalmology. Guidelines for diabetic eye care. San Francisco, California: ICO; 2017. Available: https://icoph.org/eye-care-delivery/diabetic-eye-care/

5. Telemedical diabetic retinopathy screening in a primary care setting: Quality of retinal photographs and accuracy of automated image analysis;Ophthalmic Epidemiology,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3