Modelling the probability of meeting IUCN Red List criteria to support reassessments

Author:

Henry Etienne GeorgesORCID,Santini LucaORCID,Butchart StuartORCID,Gonzalez-Suarez ManuelaORCID,Lucas Pablo MiguelORCID,Benitez-Lopez AnaORCID,Mancini GiordanoORCID,Jung MartinORCID,Cardoso PedroORCID,Zizka AlexanderORCID,Meyer CarstenORCID,Akcakaya H. ResitORCID,Berryman AlexORCID,Cazalis VictorORCID,Di Marco MorenoORCID

Abstract

AbstractComparative extinction risk analysis - which predicts species extinction risk from correlation with traits or geographical characteristics - has gained research attention as a promising tool to support extinction risk assessment in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. However, its uptake has been very limited so far, possibly because these models only predict a species’ Red List category, without indicating which Red List criteria may be triggered by which such approaches cannot easily be used in Red List assessments. We overcome this implementation gap by developing models that predict the probability of species meeting individual Red List criteria. Using data on the world’s birds, we evaluated the predictive performance of our criterion-specific models and compared it with the typical criterion-blind modelling approach. We compiled data on biological traits (e.g., range size, clutch size) and external drivers (e.g., change in canopy cover) often associated with extinction risk. For each specific criterion, we modelled the relationship between extinction risk predictors and species’ Red List category under that criterion using ordinal regression models. We found criterion-specific models were better at predicting threatened species compared to a criterion-blind model (higher sensitivity), but less good at predicting not threatened species (lower specificity). As expected, different covariates were important for predicting threat status under different criteria, for example change in annual temperature was important to predict criteria related to population trends, while clutch size was important for criteria related to restricted area of occupancy or small population size. Our criteria-specific method can support Red List assessors by producing outputs that identify species likely to meet specific criteria, and which are the most important predictors: these species can be prioritised for re-evaluation. We expect this new approach to increase the uptake of extinction risk models in Red List assessments, bridging a long-standing research-implementation gap.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference68 articles.

1. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS)

2. Progress, challenges and opportunities for Red Listing;Biological Conservation,2019

3. Baston, ISciences, LLC, 2022. exactextractr, Version:0.8.2.

4. A framework for evaluating the impact of the IUCN Red List of threatened species;Conservation Biology,2020

5. BirdLife International , 2022. IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.orgon 15/06/2022.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3