The association between childhood income and mental health: can sibling comparison designs help resolve this research question?

Author:

Ejlskov Linda,Esen Buket Öztürk,Hakulinen ChristianORCID,Weye Nanna,Formanek Tomas,McGrath John J.ORCID,Pedersen Carsten Bøcker,Plana-Ripoll OleguerORCID

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIn previous studies, null results from sibling comparison designs have been used to infer that no causal association exists between childhood family income and subsequent risk of mental disorders. The aim of our study is to replicate the findings from previous studies and propose three alternative explanations based on i) variability in income and mental health between siblings, ii) life course models, and iii) detailed descriptive statistics.MethodsWe followed a nationwide Danish cohort born from 1986 to 1996 (n = 643,814, including 404,179 siblings) from age 15 until diagnosis of severe mental disorders or censoring. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) were estimated between childhood family income and subsequent mental disorders, accompanied by comprehensive descriptive statistics and triangulation analyses that help in interpreting the findings.ResultsWe observed an association between a $15,000 increase in family income and severe mental disorders (0.78; 0.76-0.81), but the sibling comparison design showed null results (1.02; 0.94-1.11). Siblings were typically born three years apart, with a difference in monthly average income at age 14 of $496 (interquartile range: $150-$641). A pseudo-sibling cohort also indicated null results (0.93; 0.85-1.01), although siblings were not family members. Family income measured yearly demonstrated comparable estimates across ages 1-14 (from 0.67 to 0.82).ConclusionOur investigation suggests that the null associations between childhood income and mental health estimated through sibling comparison designs may be explained by the fact that siblings are close together in age and residing within the same family income environment with only minor income fluctuations. Additionally, a sibling comparison design is useful to test a critical/sensitive period, but our analyses suggest that no age posits a critical risk age for this research question. This raises caution on the current practice of relying on sibling comparison designs to estimate the association between childhood income and mental health.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3