A mixed methods analysis of youth mental health intervention feasibility and acceptability in a North American city: perspectives from Seattle, Washington

Author:

Mensa-Kwao AugustinaORCID,Cuc Ingrid Sub,Concepcion Tessa,Kemp Christopher G.,Hughsam Matthew,Sinha Moitreyee,Collins Pamela Y.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionIn March 2021, the Governor of Washington declared a youth mental health crisis. State data revealed high rates of youth suicide and inadequate access to services. This mixed-methods study examines youth and adult perspectives on mental health service gaps and opportunities in Seattle by assessing needs, feasibility, and acceptability of interventions to support youth mental health.MethodsWe interviewed 15 key informants to identify the contextual, structural, and individual-level factors that increase the risk of poor mental health and deter access to care among young people. We complimented these data with a cross-sectional 25-item survey of 117 participants in King County to assess the feasibility and acceptability of interventions for youth mental health. We conducted a deductive thematic qualitative analysis of the interviews and performed descriptive analyses of the quantitative data, using t-tests and χ2tests to summarize and compare participant characteristics stratified by age group.ResultsQualitative informants attributed challenges to youth mental health to social and relational problems. Example interventions included creating environments that increase belonging and implementation of culturally congruent mental health services. Quantitative study participants rated all evidence-based mental health interventions presented as highly acceptable. However, youth preferred interventions promoting social connectedness, peer support, and holistic approaches to care, while non-youth preferred interventions focused on suicide, alcohol, and substance abuse prevention. Both key informants and survey participants identified schools as the highest priority setting for mental health interventions. There were no significant differences among quantitative outcomes.ConclusionOur findings highlight the need for reducing social isolation and increasing social connectedness to support youth mental health. Schools and digital tools were preferred platforms for implementation. Engaging multiple stakeholders, especially young people, and addressing cultural needs and accessibility of mental health resources are important pre-implementation activities for youth mental health intervention in a US city.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference61 articles.

1. Office of the Surgeon G. Publications and Reports of the Surgeon General. Protecting Youth Mental Health: The US Surgeon General’s Advisory. Washington (DC): US Department of Health and Human Services; 2021.

2. Furfaro H. Washington students are facing a mental health crisis. Here’s why schools are on the front lines. The Seattle Times. 2021.

3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Multiple Cause of Death Files, 2018-2020: CDC WONDER [Online Database]; 2022 [Available from: https://wonder.cdc.gov/wonder/help/mcd-expanded.html.

4. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Global Health Data Exchange, Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 Seattle: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation 2020 [

5. Health Resources & Services Administration. BHW Footprint Map [Data file and interactive map] 2022 [Available from: https://data.hrsa.gov/topics/health-workforce/bhw-footprint.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3