Machine learning vs. traditional regression analysis for fluid overload prediction in the ICU

Author:

Sikora Andrea,Zhang Tianyi,Murphy David J.,Smith Susan E.,Murray Brian,Kamaleswaran RishikesanORCID,Chen Xianyan,Buckley Mitchell S.,Rowe Sandra,Devlin John W.

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundFluid overload, while common in the ICU and associated with serious sequelae, is hard to predict and may be influenced by ICU medication use. Machine learning (ML) approaches may offer advantages over traditional regression techniques to predict it. We compared the ability of traditional regression techniques and different ML-based modeling approaches to identify clinically meaningful fluid overload predictors.MethodsThis was a retrospective, observational cohort study of adult patients admitted to an ICU ≥ 72 hours between 10/1/2015 and 10/31/2020 with available fluid balance data. Models to predict fluid overload (a positive fluid balance ≥10% of the admission body weight) in the 48-72 hours after ICU admission were created. Potential patient and medication fluid overload predictor variables (n=28) were collected at either baseline or 24 hours after ICU admission. The optimal traditional logistic regression model was created using backward selection. Supervised, classification-based ML models were trained and optimized, including a meta-modeling approach. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were compared between the traditional and ML fluid prediction models.ResultsA total of 49 of the 391 (12.5%) patients developed fluid overload. Among the ML models, the XGBoost model had the highest performance (AUROC 0.78, PPV 0.27, NPV 0.94) for fluid overload prediction. The XGBoost model performed similarly to the final traditional logistic regression model (AUROC 0.70; PPV 0.20, NPV 0.94). Feature importance analysis revealed severity of illness scores and medication-related data were the most important predictors of fluid overload.ConclusionIn the context of our study, ML and traditional models appear to perform similarly to predict fluid overload in the ICU. Baseline severity of illness and ICU medication regimen complexity are important predictors of fluid overload.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference62 articles.

1. Carr JR , Hawkins WA , Newsome AS , et al: Fluid stewardship of maintenance Intravenous fluids. J Pharm Pract 2021:8971900211008261

2. Fluid stewardship during critical illness: a call to action;J Pharm Pract,2020

3. Impact of protocolized diuresis for deresuscitation in the intensive care unit;Crit Care,2020

4. Early diuretics for de-resuscitation in septic patients with left ventricular dysfunction;Clin Med Insights Cardiol,2022

5. From theory to bedside: implementation of fluid stewardship in a medical ICU pharmacy practice;Am J Health Syst Pharm,2022

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3