Abstract
ABSTRACTBackgroundThe CDC recently defined being “up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination as having received at least one dose of a COVID-19 bivalent vaccine. The purpose of this study was to compare the risk of COVID-19 among those “up-to-date” and “not up-to-date”.MethodsEmployees of Cleveland Clinic in Ohio, USA, in employment when the COVID-19 bivalent vaccine first became available, and still employed when the XBB lineages became dominant, were included. Cumulative incidence of COVID-19 since the XBB lineages became dominant was compared across the ”up-to-date” and “not up-to-date” states, by treating COVID-19 bivalent vaccination as a time- dependent covariate whose value changed on receipt of the vaccine. Risk of COVID-19 by vaccination status was also evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression adjusting for propensity to get tested for COVID-19, age, sex, most recent prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, and number of prior vaccine doses.ResultsCOVID-19 occurred in 1475 (3%) of 48 344 employees during the 100-day study period. The cumulative incidence of COVID-19 was lower in the “not up-to-date” than the “up-to-date” state. On multivariable analysis, being “up-to-date” was not associated with lower risk of COVID-19 (HR, 1.05; 95% C.I., 0.88-1.25;P-value, 0.58). Results were very similar when those 65 years and older were only considered “up-to-date” after 2 doses of the bivalent vaccine.ConclusionsSince the XBB lineages became dominant, adults “up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination by the CDC definition do not have a lower risk of COVID-19 than those “not up-to-date”, bringing into question the value of this risk classification definition.SummaryAmong 48 344 working-aged Cleveland Clinic employees, those “up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination did not have a lower risk of COVID-19 than those not “up-to-date”. The current CDC definition provides a meaningless classification of risk of COVID-19 in the adult population.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference10 articles.
1. COVID-19 Vaccination. 2023. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/stay-up-to-date.html. Accessed 9 May 2023.
2. Shrestha NK , Burke PC , Nowacki AS , Simon JF , Hagen A , Gordon SM . Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Bivalent Vaccine. Open Forum Infect Dis 2023; :ofad209.
3. Shrestha NK , Nowacki AS , Burke PC , Terpeluk P , Gordon SM . Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines among Employees in an American Healthcare System. 2021: 2021.06.02.21258231. Available at: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.02.21258231v1. Accessed 10 August 2021.
4. Necessity of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccination in Persons Who Have Already Had COVID-19;Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am,2022
5. Vaccine Boosting in Previously Infected or Vaccinated Individuals (COVID-19);Clin Infect Dis,2019