Abstract
AbstractThe proboscis extension response (PER) has been widely used for decades to evaluate honeybees’ (Apis mellifera)learning and memory abilities. This classical conditioning paradigm is traditionally administered manually, and produces a binary score for each subject depending on the presence or absence of the proboscis extension in response to a stimulus - typically an odor which has been associated with a sucrose reward - to classify whether or not the bee has learned the association. Here we present a fully automated PER system which delivers stimuli in a more controlled manner, and thus standardizes the protocol within and between labs; further, the AI-facilitated behavioral scoring reduces human error and allows us to extract a richer meaning from the outcome. The automated frame-by-frame assessment goes beyond the binary classification of “learned” or “not learned”, expanding the possibilities for many other measures. Using this method, we investigate the real-time decision-making processes of honeybees faced with difficult learning tasks. When posed with a quantitative (rather than qualitative, as in the case of different odors) PER association, honeybees show a pattern of rapid generalization to both the rewarded and non-rewarded stimuli, followed by a slowly acquired discrimination between the two. Our work lays the foundation for deeper exploration of the honeybee cognitive processes when posed with complex learning challenges.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory