Population-level hypertension control rate in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis of community based non-interventional studies, 2001-2020

Author:

Koya Shaffi FazaludeenORCID,Pilakkadavath Zarin,Wilson Tom,Chandran Praseeda,Kuriakose Serin,Akbar Suni K,Ali Althaf

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundHypertension is a significant contributor to mortality in India. Adequate control of hypertension is important to prevent cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based, non-interventional studies published between 2001 and 2020. We screened records from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We conducted random-effects meta-analysis to provide overall summary estimates and subgroup estimates, and mixed-effects meta-regression with sex, region, and study period as covariates. The risk of bias was assessed using modified New Castle-Ottawa scales. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021267973.ResultsThe systematic review included 37 studies (n=170,631 hypertensive patients). Twelve studies (32%) reported poorer control rates among males than females, four studies (11%) reported poorer control rates among rural patients, while very few studies reported differences across socioeconomic variables. The overall control rate was 33.2% (n=84,485, 95% CI=27.9,38.6) with substantial heterogeneity (I2=99.1%, \chi^2= 3003.91, 95% CI=98.9,99.2; p <0.001). Unadjusted sub-group analysis showed significantly different hypertension control rates across regions (n=12,938, p=0.003) but not across study periods (n= 84,485, p=0.22), or sex (n= 81,197, p=0.22). Meta-regression showed that control rates increased by 14.7% during 2011-2020 compared to 2001-2010 (95%CI=5.8, 23.5, p=0.0021), and was 26.3% higher in the south (95%CI=12.6, 39.9, p=0.0005) and 15.9% higher in the west (95%CI=3.4, 31.4, p=0.0456) compared to the east. The control rates did not differ by sex.ConclusionHypertension is adequately controlled only among one-third of patients in India. The control rate has improved during 2011-2020 compared to 2001-2010, but substantial differences exist across regions. Very few studies examined relevant socioeconomic factors relevant to hypertension control. India needs more studies at the community level to understand the health system and socioeconomic factors that determine uncontrolled hypertension in India.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference67 articles.

1. Global Health Estimates: Life expectancy and leading causes of death and disability. Accessed January 2, 2022. https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-estimates

2. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990–2019

3. Global Disparities of Hypertension Prevalence and Control

4. GBD India Compare | IHME Viz Hub. Accessed January 2, 2022. http://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/india

5. Indian Council of Medical Research, Public Health Foundation of India, University of Washington, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. India: Health of the Nation’s States□: The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative□: Disease Burden Trends in the States of India, 1990 to 2016.; 2017.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3