Priorities setting in mental health research: a scoping review

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveResearch processes are opening to stakeholders beyond the scientific community. We analyse the user involvement in the definition of research priorities in the field of mental health. Mental disorders represent a significant disease burden at a global scale and their identification and treatment involves caregivers, patients and related social groups such as family and friends. Therefore it is an area conducive to the application of participatory methods in priority setting. We present a scoping review of participatory methods in mental health priority setting for the period 2010-2020 to shed light on their spread and characteristics, the types of groups involved and the link with the priorities identified.MethodsFirst we describe the eligibility criteria for the scoping review. We selected peer-reviewed documents published between 2010 and 2020 using MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycINFO, the Core Collection of the Web of Science and Scopus, applying controlled terms of search. We initially identified 330 documents from which we selected seventy-four after further discarding studies that were not specifically addressing priority setting in mental disorders research. We noted and classified the interest groups participating in every study.ResultsPriority setting partnerships are becoming the most frequent participatory instruments for priority setting in mental health. We identify regional differences in the extent to which such methods are being applied. When research beneficiaries participate in priority setting, prioritised research focuses on therapy, standards, education and psychology of mental disorders. When participation is limited to scientists, therapy, diagnosis, methods and standards, receive more attention.