Perfusion Quantification in the Human Brain Using DSC MRI – Simulations and Validations at 3T

Author:

Schulman J.ORCID,Sayin E.S.,Manalac A.,Poublanc J.,Sobczyk O.,Duffin J.,Fisher J.A.,Mikulis D.J.,Uludağ K.

Abstract

AbstractGadolinium (Gd) and deoxyhemoglobin (dOHb) are paramagnetic contrast agents capable of inducing changes in T2*-weighted MRI signal, utilized in dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI. With multiple contrast agents and analysis choices, there are a variety of questions as to its capability to accurately quantify perfusion values. To address these questions, we developed a novel signal model for DSC MRI that incorporates signal contributions from intravascular and extravascular water proton spins at 3T for arterial, venous, and cerebral tissue voxels. This framework allowed us to model the MRI signal in response to changes in Gd and dOHb concentrations, and the effects that various experimental and tissue parameters have on perfusion quantification. We compared the predictions of the numerical simulations with those obtained from experimental data at 3T on six healthy human subjects using Gd and dOHb boluses as contrast agents. Using standard DSC analysis, we identified perfusion quantification dependencies in the experimental results that were in close agreement with the simulations. We found that a reduced baseline oxygen saturation (base-SaO2), greater susceptibility of applied contrast agent (Gd vs dOHb), and larger magnitude of the hypoxic drop (ΔSaO2) reduces overestimation of the cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and flow (rCBF). Furthermore, shortening the bolus duration increases the accuracy and reduces the calculated values of mean transit time (MTT). This study demonstrates that changes in Gd and dOHb can be described by the same unifying theoretical framework, as validated by the experimental results. Based on our work, we suggest practices in DSC MRI that increase accuracy and reduce inter- and intra-subject variability. In uncovering a wide array of quantification dependencies, we argue that caution must be exercised when comparing perfusion values obtained from a standard DSC MRI analysis when employing different experimental paradigms.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3