Distinct patterns of cognitive outcome in young children with autism spectrum disorder receiving the Early Start Denver Model

Abstract

AbstractEvidence-based, early intervention significantly improves developmental outcome in young children with autism. Nonetheless, there is high interindividual heterogeneity in developmental trajectories during the therapy. It is currently not possible to predict a child’s developmental outcome after receiving an early intervention based on his skills and symptoms at baseline. In this study, we analyze developmental trajectories of preschoolers with autism who received 2 years of intervention using the Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) approach in Geneva, Switzerland (n = 47). Our aim was to identify early predictors of response to treatment. We applied a cluster analysis to distinguish between 3 subgroups based on their cognitive level at intake, and rates of cognitive change over the course of treatment. The first subgroup of children only had a mild cognitive delay at intake, and nearly no cognitive delay by the end of treatment (Higher Cognitive at baseline: HC). The children in the two other subgroups all presented with severe cognitive delay at baseline, however, they had two very different patterns of response to treatment. The majority significantly improved developmental scores within their first year of intervention (Optimal Responders: OptR). Whereas a minority of children showed little to no improvement over the course of treatment (Minimal Responders: MinR). Our findings suggest that children who end up having an optimal two-year treatment outcome show rapid developmental improvement. Inversely, less significant progress by the sixth month of intervention may predict a less optimal response to treatment.