Abstract
SummaryViruses often encode proteins that mimic host proteins in order to facilitate infection. Little work has been done to understand the potential mimicry of the SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV spike proteins, particularly the receptor-binding motifs, which could be important in determining tropism of the virus. Here, we use structural bioinformatics software to characterize potential mimicry of the three coronavirus spike protein receptor-binding motifs. We utilize sequence-independent alignment tools to compare structurally known or predicted three-dimensional protein models with the receptor-binding motifs and verify potential mimicry with protein docking simulations. Both human and non-human proteins were found to be similar to all three receptor-binding motifs. Similarity to human proteins may reveal which pathways the spike protein is co-opting, while analogous non-human proteins may indicate shared host interaction partners and overlapping antibody cross-reactivity. These findings can help guide experimental efforts to further understand potential interactions between human and coronavirus proteins.HighlightsPotential coronavirus spike protein mimicry revealed by structural comparisonHuman and non-human protein potential interactions with virus identifiedPredicted structural mimicry corroborated by protein-protein dockingEpitope-based alignments may help guide vaccine effortsGraphical abstract
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference172 articles.
1. Structural basis for receptor recognition by New World hemorrhagic fever arenaviruses
2. Ahuja, S.K. , and Murphy, P.M. (1999). Viral Mimicry of Chemokines and Chemokine Receptors BT -Chemokines in Disease: Biology and Clinical Research. C.A. Hébert , ed. (Totowa, NJ: Humana Press), pp. 235–251.
3. Viral mimicry of cytokines, chemokines and their receptors
4. A soluble receptor for interleukin-1β encoded by vaccinia virus: A novel mechanism of virus modulation of the host response to infection
5. The transcriptomic profiling of SARS-CoV-2 compared to SARS, MERS, EBOV, and H1N1;PLoS One,2020
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献