Improved LC-MS chromatographic alignment increases the accuracy of label-free quantitative proteomics: Comparison of spectral counting versus ion intensity-based proteomic quantification strategies

Author:

Ng Daniel H.J.,Humphries Jonathan D.ORCID,Selley Julian N.,Warwood Stacey,Knight David,Byron AdamORCID,Humphries Martin J.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe ability to provide an unbiased qualitative and quantitative description of the global changes to proteins in a cell or an organism would permit the systems-wide study of complex biological systems. Label-free quantitative shotgun proteomic strategies (including LC-MS ion intensity quantification and spectral counting) are attractive because of their relatively low cost, ease of implementation, and the lack of multiplexing restrictions when comparing multiple samples. Owing to improvements in the resolution and sensitivity of mass spectrometers, and the availability of analytical software packages, protein quantification by LC-MS ion intensity has increased in popularity. Here, we have addressed the importance of chromatographic alignment on protein quantification, and then assessed how spectral counting compares to ion intensity-based proteomic quantification. Using a spiked-in protein strategy, we analysed two situations that commonly arise in the application of proteomics to cell biology: (i) samples with a small number of proteins of differential abundance in a larger non-changing background, and (ii) samples with a larger number of proteins of differential abundance. To perform these assessments on biologically relevant samples, we used isolated integrin adhesion complexes (IACs). Technical replicate analysis of isolated IACs resulted in a range of alignment scores using the Progenesis QI software package and demonstrated that higher LC-MS chromatographic alignment scores increased the precision of protein quantification. Furthermore, implementation of a simple sample batch-running strategy enabled good chromatographic alignment for hundreds of samples over multiple batches. Finally, we applied the sample batch-running strategy and compared quantification by LC-MS ion intensity to spectral counting and found that quantification by LC-MS ion intensity was more accurate and precise. In summary, these results demonstrate that chromatographic alignment is important for precise and accurate protein quantification based on LC-MS ion intensity and accordingly we present a simple sample re-ordering strategy to facilitate improved alignment. These findings are not only relevant to label-free quantification using Progenesis QI but may be useful to the wide range of MS-based quantification strategies that rely on chromatographic alignment.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3