Assessment of the evolutionary consequence of putative driver mutations in colorectal cancer with spatial multiomic data

Author:

Heide Timon,Househam JacobORCID,Cresswell George D,Spiteri Inmaculada,Lynn Claire,Kimberley Chris,Mossner Max,Zapata Luis,Gabbutt Calum,Ramazzotti Daniele,Chen Bingjie,Fernandez-Mateos Javier,James Chela,Vinceti Alessandro,Berner Alison,Schmidt Melissa,Lakatos Eszter,Baker Ann-Marie,Nichol Daniel,Costa Helena,Mitchinson Miriam,Werner Benjamin,Iorio Francesco,Jansen Marnix,Barnes Christopher,Caravagna Giulio,Shibata Darryl,Bridgewater John,Rodriguez-Justo Manuel,Magnani LucaORCID,Graham Trevor A,Sottoriva AndreaORCID

Abstract

AbstractCancer genomic medicine relies on targeting driver genes. However, current catalogues of cancer drivers are mostly based on indirect measurements of mutation frequencies, positions or types, rather than their effect on clonal expansions in vivo. Moreover, non-genetic drivers are largely unknown, as are the epigenetic and transcriptomic effects of genetic drivers. Here we perform spatial computational inference on multiomic data with matched whole-genome sequencing, ATAC-seq and RNA-seq. Using 436 samples, we directly quantify the contribution, or lack thereof, of putative driver genes to subclonal expansions in vivo in 30 colorectal carcinomas (4-33 samples per patient, median=15). Although subclonal neutral evolution was widespread (13/26 cases with sufficient data), there were cases with clear evidence of subclonal selection (6/26) in which we measured epigenetic and transcriptomic differences between subclones in vivo. In 7/26 cases we could not distinguish between neutral or selective evolution with the available data. We identified expanding subclones that were not driven by known genetic alterations, and propose candidate epigenetic drivers. We identified the distinguishing patterns of genomic heterogeneity produced in fast, exponentially growing tumours (7/26) versus neoplasms growing only at the periphery (19/26), as well as identifying clonally intermixed (16/28 cases with sufficient data) versus segregated malignancies (10/28). Our model-based approach measures genetic and non-genetic subclonal selection, or lack thereof, in space and time and allows in vivo comparisons of the emergent phenotypic properties of subclones within human tumours.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3