Better Antimicrobial Resistance Data Analysis & Reporting in Less Time

Author:

Luz Christian F.ORCID,Berends Matthijs S.ORCID,Zhou XueweiORCID,Lokate MariëtteORCID,Friedrich Alex W.,Sinha BhanuORCID,Glasner CorinnaORCID

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionThe global challenge of antimicrobial resistances (AMR) requires the rational and responsible use of antimicrobials. Insights and knowledge about the local AMR levels and epidemiology are essential to guide optimal decision-making processes in antimicrobial use. However, dedicated tools for reliable and reproducible AMR data analysis and reporting are often lacking. Previously, we have developed a novel approach to AMR data analysis and reporting using open-source software tools. In this study, we aimed at comparing the effectiveness and efficiency of traditional analysis and reporting versus this new approach for reliable and reproducible AMR data analysis in a clinical setting.MethodsTen professionals in the field of AMR that routinely work with AMR data were recruited to participate and provided with one year’s blood culture test results from a tertiary care hospital results including antimicrobial susceptibility test results. Participants were asked to perform a detailed AMR data analysis in a two-step process: first (round 1) using their analysis software of choice and next (round 2) using the previously developed open-source software tools. Accuracy of the results and time spent were compared between the two rounds. Paired student’s t-tests were used to test for statistical significance. Finally, participants rated the usability of the tools using the systems usability scale.ResultsThe mean time spent on creating a comprehensive AMR report reduced from 93.7 (SD ±21.6) minutes to 22.4 (SD ±13.7) minutes (p < 0.001). Average task completion per round changed from 56% (SD: ±23%) to 96% (SD: ±5.5%) (p<0.05). The proportion of correct answers in the available results increased from 37.9% in the first round to 97.9% in the second round (p < 0.001). The usability of the new AMR reporting tool was rated with a median of 83.8 (out of 100) on the system usability scale.ConclusionThis study demonstrated the significant improvement in efficiency and accuracy in standard AMR data analysis and reporting workflows through the use of open-source software tools in a clinical setting. Integrating these tools in clinical settings can democratise the access to fast and reliable insights about local microbial epidemiology and associated AMR levels. Thereby, our approach can support evidence-based decision-making processes in the use of antimicrobials.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3