NSTEMI Decide: Development of a Decision Aid for Older Adults with Non ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Author:

Summapund Jenny,Sibley Rachel A.,Iqbal Sohah,Kiefer Nicholas J.,Langford Aisha,Spatz Erica,Barnett Mallory,Rivers Joshua,Chaudhry Sarwat I.,Dickson Victoria V.,Sikand Nikhil V.,Matlock Daniel D.,Dodson John A.

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundMany patients hospitalized with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) are older adults (age ≥75), in whom invasive coronary angiography confers potential benefits but also higher risks than the general population. Our goal was to therefore develop a patient decision aid (PtDA) to assist with shared decision making (SDM) between cardiologists and older adults with this condition.MethodsWe followed International Patient Decision Aid Standards to develop the NSTEMI Decide PtDA. The initial prototype was based on structured interviews from 20 patients and 20 clinicians. Risks and benefits of invasive coronary angiography were derived from the available literature in older adults, with an emphasis on findings from randomized trials. The PtDA was then revised through an iterative, user-centered design approach with rapid prototyping using input from both clinician and patients to meet the needs of both stakeholders.ResultsThe PtDA went through 8 iterations. The final decision aid was 11 pages and included background information (6 pages), explanation of benefits and risks (4 pages), and a summary (1 page). Large font (≥26 point) was used to accommodate visual difficulties. Language was tailored to an 8th grade reading level. Based on the best available literature, we included benefits of invasive coronary angiography (recurrent myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization) and risks (stroke, bleeding, acute kidney injury). The final PtDA was converted to a mobile health application to increase usability on portable digital devices in the clinical setting.ConclusionsWe developed the first PtDA tailored to older adults hospitalized with NSTEMI. This PtDA will be prospectively tested to evaluate dimensions including feasibility of use, satisfaction with care, medical knowledge, and decisional conflict.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference46 articles.

1. Prime Time for Shared Decision Making

2. Realizing Shared Decision-making in Practice

3. Achieving Patient-Centered Care Through Shared Decision-Making. American College of Cardiology website. Published November 16, 2018. Accessed November 5, 2020. https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/articles/2018/11/06/12/42/feature-achieving-patient-centered-care-through-shared-decision-making

4. Beneficiary Engagement and Incentives Models: Shared Decision Making Model. CMS.gov. Published 2016. Accessed November 5, 2020. https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/beneficiary-engagement-and-incentives-models-shared-decision-making-model

5. Implementation of Shared Decision Making in Cardiovascular Care

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3