Fifty Ways to Tag your Pubtypes: Multi-Tagger, a Set of Probabilistic Publication Type and Study Design Taggers to Support Biomedical Indexing and Evidence-Based Medicine

Author:

Cohen Aaron M.ORCID,Schneider Jodi,Fu Yuanxi,McDonagh Marian S.,Das Prerna,Holt Arthur W.,Smalheiser Neil R.

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveIndexing articles according to publication types (PTs) and study designs can be a great aid to filtering literature for information retrieval, especially for evidence syntheses. In this study, 50 automated machine learning based probabilistic PT and study design taggers were built and applied to all articles in PubMed.Materials and MethodsPubMed article metadata from 1987-2014 were used as training data, with 2015 used for recalibration. The set of articles indexed with a particular study design MeSH term or PT tag was used as positive training sets. For each PT, the rest of the literature from the same time period was used as its negative training set. Multiple features based on each article title, abstract and metadata were used in training the models. Taggers were evaluated on PubMed articles from 2016 and 2019. A manual analysis was also performed.ResultsOf the 50 predictive models that we created, 44 of these achieved an AUC of ∼0.90 or greater, with many having performance above 0.95. Of the clinically related study designs, the best performing was SYSTEMATIC_REVIEW with an AUC of 0.998; the lowest performing was RANDOM_ALLOCATION, with an AUC of 0.823.DiscussionThis work demonstrates that is feasible to build a large set of probabilistic publication type and study design taggers with high accuracy and ranking performance. Automated tagging permits users to identify qualifying articles as soon as they are published, and allows consistent criteria to be applied across different bibliographic databases. Probabilistic predictive scores are more flexible than binary yes/no predictions, since thresholds can be tailored for specific uses such as high recall literature search, user-adjustable retrieval size, and quality improvement of manually annotated databases.ConclusionThe PT predictive probability scores for all PubMed articles are freely downloadable at http://arrowsmith.psych.uic.edu/evidence_based_medicine/mt_download.html for incorporation into user tools and workflows. Users can also perform PubMed queries at our Anne O’Tate value-added PubMed search engine http://arrowsmith.psych.uic.edu/cgi-bin/arrowsmith_uic/AnneOTate.cgi and filter retrieved articles according to both NLM-annotated and model-predicted publication types and study designs.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3