Public opinion on sharing data from UK health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent

Author:

Jones Linda A.ORCID,Nelder Jenny R.,Fryer Joseph M.,Alsop Philip H.,Geary Michael R.,Prince Mark,Cardinal Rudolf N.ORCID

Abstract

1.AbstractBACKGROUNDIn the UK, National Health Service (NHS/HSC) data is variably shared between healthcare organizations for direct care, and increasingly used in de-identified forms for research. Few large-scale studies have examined public opinion on sharing, including the treatment of mental health (MH) versus physical health (PH) data.METHODSPre-registered anonymous online survey open to all UK residents, recruiting Feb–Sep 2020. Participants were randomized to one of three framing statements regarding MH versus PH data.FINDINGSParticipants numbered 29275; 40% had experienced a MH condition. A majority supported identifiable data sharing for direct clinical care without explicit consent, but 20% opposed this. Preference for clinical/identifiable sharing decreased with distance and was slightly less for MH than PH data, with a small framing effect. Preference for research/de-identified data sharing without explicit consent showed the same small PH/MH and framing effects, plus greater preference for sharing structured data than de-identified free text. There was net support for research sharing to the NHS, academic institutions, and national research charities, net ambivalence about sharing to profit-making companies researching treatments, and net opposition to sharing to other companies (similar to sharing publicly). De-identified linkage to non-health data was generally supported, except to data held by private companies. We report demographic influences on preference. A clear majority supported a single NHS mechanism to choose uses of their data. Support for data sharing increased during the pandemic.INTERPRETATIONSupport for healthcare data sharing for direct care without explicit consent is broad but not universal. There is net support for the sharing of de-identified data for research to the NHS, academia, and the charitable sector, but not the commercial sector. A single national NHS-hosted system for patients to control the use of their NHS data for clinical purposes and for research would have broad public support.FUNDINGMRC.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference120 articles.

1. UK. National Health Service Act 2006. 2006 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/41.

2. UK General Medical Council. Confidentiality: good practice in handling patient information. 2017 http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/ethical_guidance/confidentiality.asp.

3. Caldicott F. Information: To share or not to share? The Information Governance Review. 2013; published online March. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-information-governance-review.

4. UK Department of Health. Confidentiality: NHS Code of Practice. 2003; published online Nov. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/confidentiality-nhs-code-of-practice.

5. UK. Data Protection Act 2018. 2018 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/contents/enacted.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3