Irrational risk aversion in ants is driven by perceptual mechanisms

Abstract

AbstractAnimals must often decide between exploiting safe options or risky options with a chance for large gains. While traditional optimal foraging theories assume rational energy maximisation, they fail to fully describe animal behaviour. A logarithmic rather than linear perception of stimuli may shape preference, causing animals to make suboptimal choices. Budget-based rules have also been used to explain risk-preference, and the relative importance of these theories is debated. Eusocial insects represent a special case of risk sensitivity, as they must often make collective decisions based on resource evaluations from many individuals. Previously, colonies of the ant Lasius niger were found to be risk-neutral, but the risk preference of individual foragers was unknown. Here, we tested individual L. niger in a risk sensitivity paradigm. Ants were trained to associate a scent with 0.55M sucrose solution and another scent with an equal chance of either 0.1 and 1.0M sucrose. Preference was tested in a Y-maze. Ants were extremely risk averse, with 91% choosing the safe option. Even when the risky option offered on average more sucrose (0.8M) than the fixed option, 75% preferred the latter. Based on the psychophysical Weber-Fechner law, we predicted that logarithmically balanced alternatives (0.3M vs 0.1M/0.9M) would be perceived as having equal value. Our prediction was supported, with ants having no preference for either feeder (53% chose the fixed option). Our results thus strongly support perceptual mechanisms driving risk-aversion in ants, and demonstrate that the behaviour of individual foragers can be a very poor predictor of colony-level behaviour.