Abstract
AbstractDietary supplementation with linseed, saponins and nitrate is a promising methane mitigation strategy in ruminant production. The main objective of this work was to assess the effects of these additives on the rumen microbiota in order to understand underlying microbial mechanisms of methane abatement. Two 2 × 2 factorial design studies were conducted simultaneously, which also allowed us to make a broad-based assessment of microbial responses. Eight non-lactating cows were fed diets supplemented with linseed or saponin in order to decrease hydrogen production and nitrate to deviate hydrogen consumption; also, combinations of linseed plus nitrate or saponin plus nitrate were used to explore the interaction between dietary treatments. Amplicon sequencing of 18S and 16S rRNA genes was employed to characterise rumen microbes. Nitrate fed alone or in combination in both studies dramatically affected the composition and structure of rumen microbiota, though impacts were more evident in one of the studies. Linseed moderately modified bacterial community structure with no effect on rumen methanogens and protozoa. Indicator OTU analysis revealed that both linseed and nitrate reduced the relative abundance of hydrogen-producingRuminococcaceae. Linseed increased the proportion of bacteria known to reduce succinate to propionate, whereas nitrate supplementation increased nitrate-reducing bacteria and decreased the metabolic activity of rumen methanogens. Saponins had no effect on the microbiota. Inconsistency found between the two studies, when nitrate was fed to the cows could be explained by changes in microbial ecosystem functioning rather than changes in microbial community structure.ImportanceThis study aimed at identifying the microbial mechanisms of enteric methane mitigation when linseed, nitrate and saponins were fed to non-lactating cows alone or in a combination. Hydrogen is a limiting factor in rumen methanogenesis. We hypothesised that linseed and saponins would affect hydrogen producers and nitrate would deviate hydrogen consumption thus leading to reduced methane production in the rumen. Contrary to what was foreseen, both linseed and nitrate had a deleterious effect on hydrogen producers; linseed also redirected hydrogen consumption towards propionate production, whereas nitrate stimulated the growth of nitrate reducing and hence hydrogen-consuming bacterial taxa. Fundamental knowledge of microbial mechanism involved in rumen methanogenesis, provides novel insights for the development of new or the optimisation of existing methane mitigation strategies.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference53 articles.
1. Gerber PJ , Steinfeld H , Henderson B , Mottet A , Opio C , Dijkman J , Falcucci A , Tempio G . 2013. Tackling climate change through livestock – A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome.
2. Influence of rumen protozoa on methane emission in ruminants: a meta-analysis approach
3. MitiGate; an online meta-analysis database for quantification of mitigation strategies for enteric methane emissions
4. Mitigation of enteric methane for French cattle: potential extent and cost of selected actions;Animal Production Science,2014
5. The effect and mode of action of saponins on the microbial populations and fermentation in the rumen and ruminant production;Nutrition Research Reviews,2009
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献