Abstract
AbstractObjectiveValidate the infection component of the Angus International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD9-CM) sepsis abstraction criteriaDesignObservational cohort studySetting55,000 visits/year Adult Emergency Department (ED)PatientsAll consecutive ED patient visits between 12/16/2011 and 08/13/2012 were included in the study. Patients were excluded if there was a missing outcome measure.InterventionsNone.Measurements and Main ResultsThe primary outcome measure was suspected infection at conclusion of the ED work-up as judged by the physician. There were 34,796 patients who presented to the ED between 12/16/11 and 8/13/12, of which 31,755 (91%) patients were included and analyzed. The original Angus sepsis abstraction criteria had a sensitivity of 55%, specificity of 97%, PPV of 82%, NPV of 88%, accuracy of 87%, and a F1score of 0.66. The modified Angus sepsis abstraction criteria which includes codes added after the original publication had a sensitivity of 65%, specificity of 96%, PPV of 81%, NPV of 91%, accuracy of 89%, and F1score of 0.72.ConclusionsIn our study, the Angus abstraction criteria have high specificity (97%), but moderate sensitivity (55%) in identifying patients with suspected infection as defined by physician at the time of disposition from the emergency department. Given these findings, it is likely that we are underestimating the true incidence of sepsis in the United States and worldwide.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献