Reward certainty and preference bias selectively shape voluntary decisions

Abstract

AbstractChoosing between equally valued options can be a conundrum, for which classical decision theories predicted a prolonged response time (RT). Paradoxically, a rational decision-maker would need no deliberative thinking in this scenario, as outcomes of alternatives are indifferent. How individuals choose between equal options remain unclear. Here, we characterized the neurocognitive processes underlying such voluntary decisions, by integrating advanced cognitive modelling and EEG recording in a probabilistic reward task, in which human participants chose between pairs of cues associated with identical reward probabilities at different levels. We showed that higher reward certainty accelerated RT. At each certainty level, participants preferred to choose one cue faster and more frequently over the other. The behavioral effects on RT persisted in simple reactions to reward cues. By using hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation for an accumulator model, we showed that the certainty and preference effects were independently associated with the rate of evidence accumulation during decisions, but not with visual encoding or motor execution latencies. Time-resolved multivariate pattern classification of EEG evoked response identified significant representations of reward certainty and preference choices as early as 120 ms after stimulus onset, with spatial relevance patterns maximal in middle central and parietal electrodes. Furthermore, EEG-informed computational modelling showed that the rate of change between N100 and P300 event-related potentials reflected changes in the model-derived rate of evidence accumulation on a trial-by-trial basis. Our findings suggested that reward certainty and preference collectively shaped voluntary decisions between equal options, providing a mechanism to prevent indecision or random behavior.