Abstract
AbstractAIMMany children who experience ischemic stroke come from bilingual backgrounds. Whether bilingual exposure affects post-stroke development is unclear. Our research evaluates the effects of bilingual vs. monolingual exposure on linguistic/cognitive development post-stroke.METHODAn institutional stroke registry and medical charts were used to gather clinical variable and outcome measure performance data on 237 children across 3 stroke-onset groups: neonatal - 0-28 days, first-year - >28 days to 12 months and childhood - 13 months to 18 years. We used the Pediatric Stroke Outcome Measure (PSOM) administered at several timepoints post-stroke, to evaluate cognitive and linguistic development.RESULTSWhile no main effect by language exposure group was found, bilingual children with stroke onset between 1 and 12 months of age, had better post-stroke performance on the language expression subscale, compared to monolinguals within 10 years after stroke onset.INTERPRETATIONOverall, no clear advantages nor detrimental effects of bilingualism were found on children’s post-stroke development of language and cognition. Our study suggests that a bilingual environment facilitates some aspects of language development – if the stroke occurs early in life.WHAT THIS PAPER ADDSBilingual exposure post-stroke in pediatric patients does not result in worse linguistic and/or cognitive development.Bilingual children with stroke onset between 1-12 months had better expressive language post-stroke.Bilingualism may be associated with protective factors when expressive language development is considered.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory