Public acceptability of non-pharmaceutical interventions to control a pandemic in the United Kingdom: a discrete choice experiment

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo understand how individuals make trade-offs between features of lockdown interventions to control a pandemic across the four nations of the United Kingdom.DesignSurvey that included a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). The survey design was informed using policy documents, social media analysis and with input from remote think aloud interviews with members of the public (n=23).SettingNation-wide survey across the four nations of the United Kingdom. Representative sample in terms of age and sex for each of the nations recruited using an online panel between 29th October and 12th December 2020.ParticipantsIndividuals who are over 18 years old. A total of 4120 adults completed the survey (1112 in England, 848 in Northern Ireland, 1143 in Scotland and 1098 in Wales).Primary outcome measureAdult’s preferences for, and trade-offs between, type of lockdown restrictions, length of lockdown, postponement of routine healthcare, excess deaths, impact on ability to buy things and unemployment.ResultsIn all four countries, one out of five respondents were willing to reduce excess deaths at all costs. The majority of adults are willing to accept higher excess deaths if this means lockdowns that are less strict, shorter and do not postpone routine healthcare. On average, respondents in England were willing to accept a higher increase in excess deaths to have less strict lockdown restrictions introduced compared to Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Wales, respectively.ConclusionsThe majority of the UK population is willing to accept the increase in excess deaths associated with introducing less strict lockdown restrictions. The acceptability of different restriction scenarios varies according to the features of the lockdown and across countries. Authorities can use information about trade-off preferences to inform the introduction of different lockdown restriction levels, and design compensation policies that maximise societal welfare.Strengths and limitations of this studyThis study offers empirical evidence that, unlike existing data from opinion polls and citizens’ panels, offers a clear understanding of the trade-offs between restrictions and impacts of lockdown on society.Estimating preferences for each nation, and quantifying them in terms of a common denominator, allows a comparison that takes into account the heterogeneity of UK nations and can be used to inform the introduction of different levels of lockdown restrictions in each.A limitation of our study is that we are not able to estimate the effect of on-going lockdowns in preferences. Furthermore, our results are not necessarily transferable to other nations.