Abstract
ABSTRACTCerebrovascular Reactivity Imaging (CVR) is a diagnostic method for assessment of alterations in cerebral blood flow in response to a controlled vascular stimulus. The principal utility is the capacity to evaluate the cerebrovascular reserve, thereby elucidating autoregulatory functioning. Over the past decade, CVR has accumulated large interest, emerging as an expanding research field and application in a diverse spectrum of patient populations. In CVR, CO2gas challenge is the most prevalent method, which elicits a vascular response by alterations in inspired CO2concentrations. While several systems have been proposed in the literature, only a limited number have been devised to operate in tandem with mechanical ventilation, thus constraining the majority CVR investigations to spontaneous breathing individuals. We have developed a new method, denoted Additional CO2, designed to enable CO2challenge in ventilators. The central idea is the introduction of an additional flow of highly concentrated CO2into the respiratory circuit, as opposed to administration of the entire gas mixture from a reservoir. By monitoring the main respiratory gas flow emanating from the ventilator, the CO2concentration in the inspired gas can be manipulated by adjusting the proportion of additional CO2. We evaluated the efficacy of this approach in controlled settings: 1) in a ventilator coupled with a test-lung and 2) in spontaneous breathing healthy volunteers. Additionally, we made a comparative analysis using a conventional method employing a gas reservoir containing a blend of O2, N2, and CO2in varying concentrations. The methods were evaluated by assessment of the precision in attaining target inspired CO2levels and examination of their performance within a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) environment. Our investigations revealed that the Additional CO2method consistently achieved a high degree of accuracy in reaching target inspired CO2levels in both mechanical ventilation and spontaneous breathing. We anticipate that these findings will lay the groundwork for a broader implementation of CVR assessments in mechanically ventilated patients.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory